» Articles » PMID: 35754531

Pharmacokinetics of Cannabidiol Following Intranasal, Intrarectal, and Oral Administration in Healthy Dogs

Overview
Journal Front Vet Sci
Date 2022 Jun 27
PMID 35754531
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The therapeutic potential of cannabidiol (CBD), a non-psychtropic component of the plant, is substantiated more and more. We aimed to determine the pharmacokinetic behavior of CBD after a single dose intranasal (IN) and intrarectal (IR) administration in six healthy Beagle dogs age 3-8 years old, and compare to the oral administration route (PO). Standardized dosages applied for IN, IR and PO were 20, 100, and 100 mg, respectively. Each dog underwent the same protocol but received CBD through a different administration route. CBD plasma concentrations were determined by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry before and at fixed time points after administration. Non-compartmental analysis was performed on the plasma concentration-time profiles. Plasma CBD concentrations after IR administration were below the limit of quantification. The mean area under the curve (AUC) after IN and PO CBD administration was 61 and 1,376 ng/mL*h, respectively. The maximal plasma CBD concentration (C) after IN and PO CBD administration was 28 and 217 ng/mL reached after 0.5 and 3.5 h (T), respectively. Significant differences between IN and PO administration were found in the T ( = 0.04). Higher AUC and C were achieved with 100 mg PO compared to 20 mg IN, but no significant differences were found when AUC ( = 0.09) and C ( = 0.44) were normalized to 1 mg dosages. IN administration of CBD resulted in faster absorption when compared to PO administration. However, PO remains the most favorable route for CBD delivery due to its more feasible administration. The IR administration route is not advised for clinical application.

Citing Articles

Pharmacokinetics of Non-Psychotropic Phytocannabinoids.

Lacerda M, Carona A, Castanheira S, Falcao A, Bicker J, Fortuna A Pharmaceutics. 2025; 17(2).

PMID: 40006604 PMC: 11858989. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics17020236.


The Potential of Cannabidiol for Treating Canine Atopic Dermatitis.

Bizarro A, Schmidt V, Fernandes B, Pinto M, Pereira H, Marto J Vet Sci. 2025; 12(2).

PMID: 40005919 PMC: 11861043. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci12020159.


Endocannabinoid system and phytocannabinoids in the main species of veterinary interest: a comparative review.

Di Salvo A, Chiaradia E, Sforna M, Rocca G Vet Res Commun. 2024; 48(5):2915-2941.

PMID: 39162768 PMC: 11442603. DOI: 10.1007/s11259-024-10509-7.


Pharmacokinetics behavior of four cannabidiol preparations following single oral administration in dogs.

Limsuwan S, Phonsatta N, Panya A, Asasutjarit R, Tansakul N Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1389810.

PMID: 38725584 PMC: 11080651. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1389810.


Full spectrum cannabidiol-rich extract reduced propofol dosage required for anesthetic induction in dogs-a pilot study.

Hasckel Gewehr J, Enzele M, Freiria L, Nunes M, Spengler J, Dondoerfer Teixeira A Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1352314.

PMID: 38645644 PMC: 11026717. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1352314.


References
1.
Musulin S, Mariani C, Papich M . Diazepam pharmacokinetics after nasal drop and atomized nasal administration in dogs. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2011; 34(1):17-24. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.2010.01186.x. View

2.
Verrico C, Wesson S, Konduri V, Hofferek C, Vazquez-Perez J, Blair E . A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of daily cannabidiol for the treatment of canine osteoarthritis pain. Pain. 2020; 161(9):2191-2202. PMC: 7584779. DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001896. View

3.
Russo E . Cannabis and epilepsy: An ancient treatment returns to the fore. Epilepsy Behav. 2016; 70(Pt B):292-297. DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.09.040. View

4.
Gamble L, Boesch J, Frye C, Schwark W, Mann S, Wolfe L . Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Clinical Efficacy of Cannabidiol Treatment in Osteoarthritic Dogs. Front Vet Sci. 2018; 5:165. PMC: 6065210. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00165. View

5.
Kumar N, Gautam M, Lochhead J, Wolak D, Ithapu V, Singh V . Relative vascular permeability and vascularity across different regions of the rat nasal mucosa: implications for nasal physiology and drug delivery. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:31732. PMC: 4997340. DOI: 10.1038/srep31732. View