Paired Associative Stimulation Applied to the Cortex Can Increase Resting-state Functional Connectivity: A Proof of Principle Study

Overview

Journal Neurosci Lett

Specialty Neurology

Date 2022 Jun 26

PMID 35753613

Authors

Andrew Hooyman

Alexander Garbin

Beth E Fisher

Jason J Kutch

Carolee J Winstein

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: There is emerging evidence that high Beta coherence (hBc) between prefrontal and motor corticies, measured with resting-state electroencephalography (rs-EEG), can be an accurate predictor of motor skill learning and stroke recovery. However, it remains unknown whether and how intracortical connectivity may be influenced using neuromodulation. Therefore, a cortico-cortico PAS (ccPAS) paradigm may be used to increase resting-state intracortical connectivity (rs-IC) within a targeted neural circuit.

Purpose: Our purpose is to demonstrate proof of principle that ccPAS can be used to increase rs-IC between a prefrontal and motor cortical region.

Methods: Eleven non-disabled adults were recruited (mean age 26.4, sd 5.6, 5 female). Each participant underwent a double baseline measurement, followed by a real and control ccPAS condition, counter-balanced for order. Control and ccPAS conditions were performed over electrodes of the right prefrontal and motor cortex. Both ccPAS conditions were identical apart from the inter-stimulus interval (i.e ISI 5 ms: real ccPAS and 500 ms: control ccPAS). Whole brain rs-EEG of high Beta coherence (hBc) was acquired before and after each ccPAS condition and then analyzed for changes in rs-IC along the targeted circuit.

Results: Compared to ccPAS500 and baseline, ccPAS5 induced a significant increase in rs-IC, measured as coherence between electrodes over right prefrontal and motor cortex, (p <.05).

Conclusion: These findings demonstrate proof of principle that ccPAS with an STDP derived ISI, can effectively increase hBc along a targeted circuit.

References

Veniero D, Ponzo V, Koch G . Paired associative stimulation enforces the communication between interconnected areas. J Neurosci. 2013; 33(34):13773-83. PMC: 6618662. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1777-13.2013. View

Stefan K, Kunesch E, Cohen L, Benecke R, Classen J . Induction of plasticity in the human motor cortex by paired associative stimulation. Brain. 2000; 123 Pt 3:572-84. DOI: 10.1093/brain/123.3.572. View

Koch G, Ruge D, Cheeran B, Fernandez Del Olmo M, Pecchioli C, Marconi B . TMS activation of interhemispheric pathways between the posterior parietal cortex and the contralateral motor cortex. J Physiol. 2009; 587(Pt 17):4281-92. PMC: 2754365. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.174086. View

Casula E, Rocchi L, Hannah R, Rothwell J . Effects of pulse width, waveform and current direction in the cortex: A combined cTMS-EEG study. Brain Stimul. 2018; 11(5):1063-1070. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.04.015. View

Rizzo V, Siebner H, Morgante F, Mastroeni C, Girlanda P, Quartarone A . Paired associative stimulation of left and right human motor cortex shapes interhemispheric motor inhibition based on a Hebbian mechanism. Cereb Cortex. 2008; 19(4):907-15. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhn144. View

Lu M, Tsai C, Ziemann U . Cerebellum to motor cortex paired associative stimulation induces bidirectional STDP-like plasticity in human motor cortex. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012; 6:260. PMC: 3446544. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00260. View

OLDFIELD R . The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971; 9(1):97-113. DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4. View

Golestani A, Tymchuk S, Demchuk A, Goodyear B . Longitudinal evaluation of resting-state FMRI after acute stroke with hemiparesis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012; 27(2):153-63. DOI: 10.1177/1545968312457827. View

Foerster A, Rocha S, Wiesiolek C, Chagas A, Machado G, Silva E . Site-specific effects of mental practice combined with transcranial direct current stimulation on motor learning. Eur J Neurosci. 2013; 37(5):786-94. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.12079. View

10.

Johnen V, Neubert F, Buch E, Verhagen L, OReilly J, Mars R . Causal manipulation of functional connectivity in a specific neural pathway during behaviour and at rest. Elife. 2015; 4. PMC: 4353194. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.04585. View

11.

van den Heuvel M, Mandl R, Kahn R, Hulshoff Pol H . Functionally linked resting-state networks reflect the underlying structural connectivity architecture of the human brain. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009; 30(10):3127-41. PMC: 6870902. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20737. View

12.

Hamada M, Murase N, Hasan A, Balaratnam M, Rothwell J . The role of interneuron networks in driving human motor cortical plasticity. Cereb Cortex. 2012; 23(7):1593-605. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhs147. View

13.

Stewart J, Dewanjee P, Shariff U, Cramer S . Dorsal premotor activity and connectivity relate to action selection performance after stroke. Hum Brain Mapp. 2016; 37(5):1816-30. PMC: 4836996. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23138. View

14.

Sugata H, Yagi K, Yazawa S, Nagase Y, Tsuruta K, Ikeda T . Role of beta-band resting-state functional connectivity as a predictor of motor learning ability. Neuroimage. 2020; 210:116562. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116562. View

15.

Huber R, Maatta S, Esser S, Sarasso S, Ferrarelli F, Watson A . Measures of cortical plasticity after transcranial paired associative stimulation predict changes in electroencephalogram slow-wave activity during subsequent sleep. J Neurosci. 2008; 28(31):7911-8. PMC: 2809373. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1636-08.2008. View

16.

Kaminski E, Hoff M, Sehm B, Taubert M, Conde V, Steele C . Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) during complex whole body motor skill learning. Neurosci Lett. 2013; 552:76-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.07.034. View

17.

Wiethoff S, Hamada M, Rothwell J . Variability in response to transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex. Brain Stimul. 2014; 7(3):468-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.02.003. View

18.

Bi G, Poo M . Synaptic modifications in cultured hippocampal neurons: dependence on spike timing, synaptic strength, and postsynaptic cell type. J Neurosci. 1998; 18(24):10464-72. PMC: 6793365. View

19.

L R, DA S, V P, M O, Ps B, Jc R . Cerebellar noninvasive neuromodulation influences the reactivity of the contralateral primary motor cortex and surrounding areas: a TMS-EMG-EEG study. Cerebellum. 2022; 22(3):319-331. DOI: 10.1007/s12311-022-01398-0. View

20.

Koch G, Ponzo V, Di Lorenzo F, Caltagirone C, Veniero D . Hebbian and anti-Hebbian spike-timing-dependent plasticity of human cortico-cortical connections. J Neurosci. 2013; 33(23):9725-33. PMC: 6619701. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4988-12.2013. View