Alveolar Dead Space Is Augmented During Exercise in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) exhibit many cardiopulmonary abnormalities that could result in V˙/Q˙ mismatch, manifesting as an increase in alveolar dead space (VD) during exercise. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that VD would increase during exercise to a greater extent in patients with HFpEF compared with control participants.
Research Question: Do patients with HFpEF develop VD during exercise?
Study Design And Methods: Twenty-three patients with HFpEF and 12 control participants were studied. Gas exchange (ventilation [V˙], oxygen uptake [V˙o], and CO elimination [V˙co]) and arterial blood gases were analyzed at rest, twenty watts (20W), and peak exercise. Ventilatory efficiency (evaluated as the V˙/V˙co slope) also was measured from rest to 20W in patients with HFpEF. The physiologic dead space (VD) to tidal volume (VT) ratio (VD/VT) was calculated using the Enghoff modification of the Bohr equation. VD was calculated as: (VD / VT × VT) - anatomic dead space. Data were analyzed between groups (patients with HFpEF vs control participants) across conditions (rest, 20W, and peak exercise) using a two-way repeated measures analysis of variance and relationships were analyzed using Pearson correlation coefficient.
Results: VD increased from rest (0.12 ± 0.07 L/breath) to 20W (0.22 ± 0.08 L/breath) in patients with HFpEF (P < .01), whereas VD did not change from rest (0.01 ± 0.06 L/breath) to 20W (0.06 ± 0.13 L/breath) in control participants (P = .19). Thereafter, VD increased from 20W to peak exercise in patients with HFpEF (0.37 ± 0.16 L/breath; P < .01 vs 20W) and control participants (0.19 ± 0.17 L/breath; P = .03 vs 20W). VD was greater in patients with HFpEF compared with control participants at rest, 20W, and peak exercise (main effect for group, P < .01). Moreover, the increase in VD correlated with the V˙/V˙co slope (r = 0.69; P < .01), which was correlated with peak V˙o (r = 0.46; P < .01) in patients with HFpEF.
Interpretation: These data suggest that the increase in V˙/Q˙ mismatch may be explained by increases in VD and that increases in VD worsens ventilatory efficiency, which seems to be a key contributor to exercise intolerance in patients with HFpEF.
Goh J, Balmain B, Tomlinson A, MacNamara J, Sarma S, Ritz T Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2024; 325:104256.
PMID: 38583744 PMC: 11088520. DOI: 10.1016/j.resp.2024.104256.
Ventilatory limitations in patients with HFpEF and obesity.
Babb T, Balmain B, Tomlinson A, Hynan L, Levine B, MacNamara J Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2023; 318:104167.
PMID: 37758032 PMC: 11079902. DOI: 10.1016/j.resp.2023.104167.
Balmain B, Tomlinson A, MacNamara J, Hynan L, Wakeham D, Levine B Chest. 2023; 164(3):686-699.
PMID: 37030529 PMC: 10548458. DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.04.003.
Foster J, Balmain B, Wilhite D, Watso J, Babb T, Cramer M J Appl Physiol (1985). 2023; 134(4):1011-1021.
PMID: 36892886 PMC: 10110718. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00597.2022.