» Articles » PMID: 35752841

Engagement of People with Lived Experience of Dementia Advisory Group and Cross-cutting Program: Reflections on the First Year

Abstract

Background: The objective of this paper is to describe the activities, challenges and mitigation strategies, lessons learned and reflections on the importance of engagement from the first year of the Canadian Consortium on Neurodegeneration in Aging (CCNA) Engagement of People with Lived Experience of Dementia (EPLED) Advisory Group and cross-cutting program. EPLED was created to support persons with dementia and care partners to be actively involved in the CCNA research process.

Main Body: The Advisory Group was formed to work with CCNA researchers and programs to develop new ways to further collaborate and advance the methods of patient engagement in research on dementia. A role profile and recruitment poster were developed and, after interviews, 17 people were invited to join the Advisory Group. We planned three online EPLED meetings to take place between July-August of 2020, with one in-person meeting to be held in Canada. Due to COVID-19, we moved all of these meetings online. In the first year, EPLED and the Advisory Group met seven times formally, four times informally, developed a website, engaged with CCNA research projects, participated in CCNA "Central" activities and formulated an evaluation plan. For researchers and people with lived experience of dementia, motivations for patient engagement included challenging stigma, making meaning from their experience (such as building relationships and having their voices heard) and contributing to research. Common challenges to engagement were related to navigating the impact of COVID-19, such as difficulty in getting to know each other and technical issues with video-conference software. We learned that developing trusting relationships, providing education, offering support, being flexible and acknowledging tensions between research, practice and lived experience, were vital to the success of the Advisory Group.

Conclusion: The first year of the EPLED Advisory Group demonstrated the potential contributions of people with lived experience of dementia as partners in research. Building these collaborations with individuals and communities-people living with dementia, care partners, researchers and research institutions-has the potential for positive impact across these groups and, ultimately, improve the lives of people living with dementia and their care partners.

Citing Articles

Assessing social connection for long-term care home residents: A scoping review of measure content.

Liougas M, Sommerlad A, ORourke H, Chapman H, Dewan N, McGilton K Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2024; 10(3):e12488.

PMID: 39315314 PMC: 11418406. DOI: 10.1002/trc2.12488.


Patient and public involvement in international research: Perspectives of a team of researchers from six countries on collaborating with people with lived experiences of dementia and end-of-life.

Vellani S, Yous M, Rivas V, Lucchese S, Kruizinga J, Sussman T Health Expect. 2024; 27(1):e13942.

PMID: 39102702 PMC: 10748824. DOI: 10.1111/hex.13942.


A critical reflection on using the Patient Engagement In Research Scale (PEIRS) to evaluate patient and family partners' engagement in dementia research.

Wong J, Hung L, Bayabay C, Wong K, Berndt A, Mann J Front Dement. 2024; 3:1422820.

PMID: 39081613 PMC: 11285659. DOI: 10.3389/frdem.2024.1422820.


Engaging people with lived experience of dementia in research meetings and events: insights from multiple perspectives.

Snowball E, Aiken C, Norman M, Hykaway W, Dempster Z, Itzhak I Front Dement. 2024; 3:1421737.

PMID: 39081602 PMC: 11285645. DOI: 10.3389/frdem.2024.1421737.


Strategies for meaningful patient and public involvement in neuro-oncological research.

Piil K, Johannessen K, Pappot H Neurooncol Pract. 2024; 11(2):109-110.

PMID: 38496919 PMC: 10940832. DOI: 10.1093/nop/npad080.


References
1.
Forsythe L, Carman K, Szydlowski V, Fayish L, Davidson L, Hickam D . Patient Engagement In Research: Early Findings From The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Health Aff (Millwood). 2019; 38(3):359-367. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05067. View

2.
Greenhalgh T, Hinton L, Finlay T, Macfarlane A, Fahy N, Clyde B . Frameworks for supporting patient and public involvement in research: Systematic review and co-design pilot. Health Expect. 2019; 22(4):785-801. PMC: 6737756. DOI: 10.1111/hex.12888. View

3.
Nersesian S, Vitkin N, Grantham S, Bourgaize S . Illustrating your research: design basics for junior clinicians and scientists. BMJ. 2020; 370:m2254. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m2254. View

4.
Hemphill R, Forsythe L, Heckert A, Amolegbe A, Maurer M, Carman K . What motivates patients and caregivers to engage in health research and how engagement affects their lives: Qualitative survey findings. Health Expect. 2019; 23(2):328-336. PMC: 7104645. DOI: 10.1111/hex.12979. View

5.
Bethell J, Commisso E, Rostad H, Puts M, Babineau J, Grinbergs-Saull A . Patient engagement in research related to dementia: A scoping review. Dementia (London). 2018; 17(8):944-975. DOI: 10.1177/1471301218789292. View