» Articles » PMID: 35752590

Mini-plate Versus Reconstruction Bar Fixation for Oncologic Mandibular Reconstruction with Free Fibula Flaps: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2022 Jun 25
PMID 35752590
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction There is currently no consensus as to the comparative complication profiles of mini-plate (MP) and reconstruction bar (RB) osseous fixation in fibula flap mandibular reconstruction. The aim of this study is to compare complication rates associated with the use of MP versus RB fixation for vascularized fibula free flap (FFF) reconstruction of oncologic mandibular defects in an effort to better guide hardware utilization and pre-operative virtual surgical planning methods. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were queried to identify studies related to FFF-based mandibular reconstruction with either MP or RB fixation. Primary endpoints of interest were plate complications, wound infection, mal- or non-union, and total flap loss. Complication rates were calculated as weighted proportions and compared via Fisher's exact testing. Results Sixteen studies met inclusion criteria, which examined 1,513 patients. Only three studies directly compared MP fixation with RB fixation. MP fixation was used in 828 (54.7%) cases and RB fixation in 685 (45.3%) cases. MP fixation demonstrated greater rates of plate-related complications (32.5% versus 18.8%, p < 0.01, respectively), fistula formation (15.8% versus 4.7%, p = 0.04), total flap loss (9.4% versus 4.7%, p = 0.02), partial flap loss (20.6% versus 6.1%, p < 0.01), and re-operation for vascular compromise (13.3% versus 4.0%, p < 0.01). Rates of infection, mal-union/non-union, and wound dehiscence were similar across both groups. Conclusion Our results suggest that MP use may be associated with higher rates of plate-related complications. Though limited by outcome reporting heterogeneity, this review can serve as a template for future investigations evaluating the safety profiles of MP and RB fixation in head and neck surgery.

Citing Articles

Incidental mishaps and learning curves during free fibula reconstruction of mandible: a case report.

Poojary D, Sandeep K, Shetty K, Shetty S, Shetty P, Baptist J J Med Case Rep. 2025; 19(1):109.

PMID: 40069871 PMC: 11895340. DOI: 10.1186/s13256-025-05150-0.


Complications following miniplate insertion in maxillofacial fractures: a systematic review.

Sejati B, Kusumaatmaja A, Widiastuti M, Haniastuti T F1000Res. 2025; 13:1507.

PMID: 40028448 PMC: 11869201. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.159017.2.


Microvascular reconstruction in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a Europe-wide data collection.

Becker P, Zeller A, Goetze E, Puladi B, Holzle F, Hoffmann J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2025; 29(1):42.

PMID: 39847127 DOI: 10.1007/s10006-025-01344-4.


Biomechanical Evaluation of Hydroxyapatite/poly-l-lactide Fixation in Mandibular Body Reconstruction with Fibula Free Flap: A Finite Element Analysis Incorporating Material Properties and Masticatory Function Evaluation.

Lee S, Jung T, Kim W, Kim B, Lee J Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(10).

PMID: 39451385 PMC: 11505077. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11101009.


Comparison of reconstruction plates and miniplates in mandibular defect reconstruction with free iliac flap.

Wang Y, Wang X, Bai J, Guo S, Shang Z, Shao Z Clin Oral Investig. 2024; 28(11):585.

PMID: 39387950 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-024-05985-9.


References
1.
Tsang G, Zhang H, Yao C, Kolarski M, Gullane P, Irish J . Hardware complications in oromandibular defects: Comparing scapular and fibular based free flap reconstructions. Oral Oncol. 2017; 71:163-168. DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.06.020. View

2.
van Gemert J, Abbink J, van Es R, Rosenberg A, Koole R, Van Cann E . Early and late complications in the reconstructed mandible with free fibula flaps. J Surg Oncol. 2018; 117(4):773-780. PMC: 5901040. DOI: 10.1002/jso.24976. View

3.
Blackwell K . Unsurpassed reliability of free flaps for head and neck reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999; 125(3):295-9. DOI: 10.1001/archotol.125.3.295. View

4.
Chaine A, Pitak-Arnnop P, Hivelin M, Dhanuthai K, Bertrand J, Bertolus C . Postoperative complications of fibular free flaps in mandibular reconstruction: an analysis of 25 consecutive cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009; 108(4):488-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.05.043. View

5.
Kawasaki G, Imayama N, Yoshitomi I, Furukawa K, Umeda M . Clinical Study of Reconstruction Plates Used in the Surgery for Mandibular Discontinuity Defect. In Vivo. 2018; 33(1):191-194. PMC: 6364077. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11458. View