» Articles » PMID: 35747499

Contemporary Concepts in Osseointegration of Dental Implants: A Review

Overview
Journal Biomed Res Int
Publisher Wiley
Date 2022 Jun 24
PMID 35747499
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In a society highly conscious of esthetics, prosthetic rehabilitation of lost teeth with tissue-integrated implants has gained wide acceptance and demand by patients and clinicians. The backbone of these tissue-integrated implants is the biotechnical process of osseointegration. Although the concept has been introduced and discussed for ages, the deepening knowledge about its cellular and molecular mechanisms has led the researchers to borrow further into the factors influencing the process of osseointegration. This has aided in the hastening and improving the process of osseointegration by exploiting several, even the minutest, details and events taking place in this natural process. Recently, due to the high esthetic expectations of the patients, the implants are being loaded immediately, which demands a high degree of implant stability. Implant stability, especially secondary stability, largely depends on bone formation and integration of implants to the osseous tissues. Various factors that influence the rate and success of osseointegration can either be categorized as those related to implant characteristics like the physical and chemical macro- and microdesign of implants or the bone characteristics like the amount and quality of bone and the local and systemic host conditions, or the time or protocol followed for the functional loading of the dental implant. To address the shortcomings in osseointegration due to any of the factors, it is mandatory that continuous and reliable monitoring of the status of osseointegration is done. This review attempts to encompass the mechanisms, factors affecting, and methods to assess osseointegration, followed by a discussion on the recent advances and future perspectives in dental implantology to enhance the process of osseointegration. The review was aimed at igniting the inquisitive minds to usher further the development of technology that enhances osseointegration.

Citing Articles

Advances in Implant Surface Technology: A Biological Perspective.

Yadav S, Nath A, Suresh R, Kurumathur Vasudevan A, Balakrishnan B, Rajan Peter M Cureus. 2025; 17(1):e78264.

PMID: 40027001 PMC: 11872013. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.78264.


Comparison Between Micro- and Micro-Nano Surface Texturization in the Initial Osseointegration Process: An Experimental In Vitro and In Vivo Preclinical Study.

Gehrke S, da Costa E, Junior J, Eilers Treichel T, Fabbro M, Scarano A Bioengineering (Basel). 2025; 12(2).

PMID: 40001694 PMC: 11851884. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering12020175.


Dental Implant with Porous Structure and Anchorage: Design and Bench Testing in a Calf Rib Model Study.

Lovera K, Vanaclocha V, Atienza C, Vanaclocha A, Jorda-Gomez P, Saiz-Sapena N Materials (Basel). 2025; 18(3).

PMID: 39942366 PMC: 11820065. DOI: 10.3390/ma18030700.


Immediate dental implant placement with and without Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) in esthetic zone: A comparative study.

Iram J, Ajaz S, Hussain S, Irshad A, Shahid H, Jahangir I Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2025; 15(3):467-473.

PMID: 39830456 PMC: 11737578. DOI: 10.4103/njms.njms_42_23.


Comparison of osseointegration in commercial SLA-treated dental implants with different surface roughness: a pilot study in beagle dogs.

Kim D, Cho W, Heo S, Huh J J Adv Prosthodont. 2025; 16(6):348-357.

PMID: 39803382 PMC: 11711448. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2024.16.6.348.


References
1.
Palmquist A, Omar O, Esposito M, Lausmaa J, Thomsen P . Titanium oral implants: surface characteristics, interface biology and clinical outcome. J R Soc Interface. 2010; 7 Suppl 5:S515-27. PMC: 2952179. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2010.0118.focus. View

2.
Piglionico S, Bousquet J, Fatima N, Renaud M, Collart-Dutilleul P, Bousquet P . Porous Tantalum VS. Titanium Implants: Enhanced Mineralized Matrix Formation after Stem Cells Proliferation and Differentiation. J Clin Med. 2020; 9(11). PMC: 7697356. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9113657. View

3.
Mishra S, Chowdhary R . PEEK materials as an alternative to titanium in dental implants: A systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018; 21(1):208-222. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12706. View

4.
Huwais S, Meyer E . A Novel Osseous Densification Approach in Implant Osteotomy Preparation to Increase Biomechanical Primary Stability, Bone Mineral Density, and Bone-to-Implant Contact. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016; 32(1):27-36. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.4817. View

5.
Kaneko T, Nagai Y, Ogino M, Futami T, Ichimura T . Acoustoelectric technique for assessing the mechanical state of the dental implant-bone interface. J Biomed Mater Res. 1986; 20(2):169-76. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.820200206. View