» Articles » PMID: 35744637

Impact of Gene Disruption: Decreasing Staphylococcal Biofilm and Alteration of Transcriptomic and Proteomic Profiles

Overview
Journal Microorganisms
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2022 Jun 24
PMID 35744637
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

expresses diverse proteins at different stages of growth. The immunodominant staphylococcal antigen A (IsaA) is one of the proteins that is constitutively produced by during colonisation and infection. SACOL2584 (or ) is the gene that encodes this protein. It has been suggested that IsaA can hydrolyse cell walls, and there is still need to study gene disruption to analyse its impact on staphylococcal phenotypes and on alteration to its transcription and protein profiles. In the present study, the growth curve in RPMI medium (which mimics human plasma), autolytic activity, cell wall morphology, fibronectin and fibrinogen adhesion and biofilm formation of SH1000 (wildtype) was compared to that of MS001 ( mutant). RNA sequencing and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry were carried out on samples of both strains taken during the exponential growth phase, followed by bioinformatics analysis. Disruption of had no obvious effect on the growth curve and autolysis ability or thickness of cell walls, but this study revealed significant strength of fibronectin adherence in MS001. In particular, the mutant formed less biofilm than SH1000. In addition, proteomics and transcriptomics showed that the adhesin/biofilm-related genes and hemolysin genes, such as , and , were consistently downregulated with gene disruption. The majority of the upregulated genes or proteins in MS001 were genes. Taken together, this study provides insight into how disruption changes the expression of other genes and has implications regarding biofilm formation and biological processes.

Citing Articles

Transcriptomic analysis of cell envelope inhibition by prodigiosin in methicillin-resistant .

Liu X, Wang Z, You Z, Wang W, Wang Y, Wu W Front Microbiol. 2024; 15:1333526.

PMID: 38318338 PMC: 10839101. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1333526.

References
1.
Hiltunen A, Savijoki K, Nyman T, Miettinen I, Ihalainen P, Peltonen J . Structural and Functional Dynamics of Biofilms and Biofilm Matrix Proteins on Different Clinical Materials. Microorganisms. 2019; 7(12). PMC: 6955704. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms7120584. View

2.
Liew Y, Hamat R, van Belkum A, Chong P, Neela V . Comparative Exoproteomics and Host Inflammatory Response in Staphylococcus aureus Skin and Soft Tissue Infections, Bacteremia, and Subclinical Colonization. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2015; 22(5):593-603. PMC: 4412950. DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00493-14. View

3.
Becker S, Frankel M, Schneewind O, Missiakas D . Release of protein A from the cell wall of Staphylococcus aureus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111(4):1574-9. PMC: 3910568. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1317181111. View

4.
Sakata N, Terakubo S, Mukai T . Subcellular location of the soluble lytic transglycosylase homologue in Staphylococcus aureus. Curr Microbiol. 2005; 50(1):47-51. DOI: 10.1007/s00284-004-4381-9. View

5.
Lorenz U, Lorenz B, Schmitter T, Streker K, Erck C, Wehland J . Functional antibodies targeting IsaA of Staphylococcus aureus augment host immune response and open new perspectives for antibacterial therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010; 55(1):165-73. PMC: 3019653. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01144-10. View