» Articles » PMID: 35744406

The Effect of Dentifrice on Micro-Hardness, Surface Gloss, and Micro-Roughness of Nano Filled Conventional and Bulk-Fill Polymer Composite-A Micro Indentation and Profilometric Study

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Jun 24
PMID 35744406
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of brushing with two whitening dentifrices (Colgate Optic White (COW) and Colgate Optic White Charcoal (COC)) on surface gloss, micro-roughness, and micro-hardness of nanostructured hybrid conventional (Z350) and bulk-fill (Tetric N Ceram bulk-fill) polymer composite. In total, 96 disk samples using two nano-hybrid composite polymers (Z350 and Tetric N Ceram Bulk-fill) were prepared. All specimens were exposed to two different dentifrices (COW and COC), resulting in four main subgroups in the study. Specimens were assessed for surface gloss, micro-roughness (Ra), and micro-hardness using standardized methodology. Means and standard deviations of properties compared using paired t-test, one-way and two-way ANOVA, and post hoc test. The presence of dentifrices did not show any significant difference in micro-hardness values of Z350 (p > 0.05), whereas micro-hardness of bulk-fill composite significantly reduced on dentifrices exposure (p ≤ 0.05). Bulk-fill polymer composite showed significant reduction in gloss after dentifrice exposure (p < 0.05), however, Z350 showed no significant loss of gloss due to dentifrices (p > 0.05). A significant increase in Ra was observed for both resin materials after exposure to dentifrices (COC and COW). Conventional resin composite (Z350) showed comparable surface hardness and gloss before and after dentifrice exposure, however, micro-roughness increased significantly due to dentifrice exposure. Bulk-fill resin (Tetric N Ceram) showed significant loss of micro-hardness and gloss and increase in micro-roughness on dentifrice exposure. Conventional nano-hybrid composite polymer showed better durability in resisting loss of surface properties compared to bulk-fill resin polymer in the present experiment.

Citing Articles

Investigating the impact of whitening toothpastes on bioactive resin-based restorative materials: a comparative analysis.

Turkistani A, Hasanain F BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):1527.

PMID: 39707354 PMC: 11662638. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-05350-y.


The Effect of Charcoal-Based Dentifrice and Conventional Whitening Toothpaste on the Color Stability and Surface Roughness of Composite Resin: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies.

Wiktorski C, Michelogiannakis D, Rossouw P, Javed F Dent J (Basel). 2024; 12(3).

PMID: 38534282 PMC: 10969454. DOI: 10.3390/dj12030058.

References
1.
Trauth K, Terossi de Godoi A, Colucci V, Corona S, Catirse A . The influence of mouthrinses and simulated toothbrushing on the surface roughness of a nanofilled composite resin. Braz Oral Res. 2012; 26(3):209-14. DOI: 10.1590/s1806-83242012000300005. View

2.
da Costa J, Adams-Belusko A, Riley K, Ferracane J . The effect of various dentifrices on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites. J Dent. 2010; 38 Suppl 2:e123-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.02.005. View

3.
St Germain H, Samuelson B . Surface characteristics of resin composite materials after finishing and polishing. Gen Dent. 2015; 63(2):26-32. View

4.
da Cas N, Ruat G, Bueno R, Pachaly R, Pozzobon R . Effect of whitening toothpaste on superficial roughness of composite resin. Gen Dent. 2013; 61(4):e8-11. View

5.
ONeill C, Kreplak L, Rueggeberg F, Labrie D, Shimokawa C, Price R . Effect of tooth brushing on gloss retention and surface roughness of five bulk-fill resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017; 30(1):59-69. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12350. View