» Articles » PMID: 35743534

Assessment of Patient Satisfaction Using a New Augmented Reality Simulation Software for Breast Augmentation: A Prospective Study

Abstract

Background: Breast augmentation is one of the most frequently performed plastic surgery procedures. Providing patients with realistic 3D simulations of breast augmentation outcomes is becoming increasingly common. Until recently, such programs were expensive and required significant equipment, training, and office space. New simple user-friendly programs have been developed, but to date there remains a paucity of objective evidence comparing these 3D simulations with post-operative outcomes. The aim of this study is to assess the aesthetic similarity between a pre-operative 3D simulation generated using Arbrea breast simulation software and real post-operative outcomes, with a focus on patient satisfaction. Methods: The authors conducted a prospective study of patients requiring breast augmentation. Patients were asked to assess how realistic the simulation was compared to the one-year post-operative result using the authors’ grading scale for breast augmentation simulation assessment. Patient satisfaction with the simulations was assessed using a satisfaction visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (not at all satisfied) to 10 (very satisfied). Patient satisfaction with the surgical outcome was assessed using the BREAST-Q Augmentation Module. Results: All patients were satisfied with the simulations and with the attained breast volume, with a mean VAS score of 8.2 ± 1.2. The mean simulation time took 90 s on average. The differences between the pre-operative and one-year post-operative values of the three BREAST-Q assessments were found to be statistically significant (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Three-dimensional simulation is becoming increasingly common in pre-operative planning for breast augmentation. The present study aimed to assess the degree of similarity of three-dimensional simulations generated using Arbrea Breast Software and found that the use of the software provided a very satisfying representation for patients undergoing breast augmentation. However, we recommend informing patients that only the volume simulation is extremely accurate. On the other hand, it is necessary to not guarantee an absolute correspondence regarding the breast shape between the simulation and the post-operative result.

Citing Articles

A Bibliometric Review of Software Tools in Plastic Surgery: How They Benefit Surgeons and Improve Practice from 2004 to 2024.

Liu Z, Li X, Zhao C, Li J, Li H, Zhang C Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025; .

PMID: 39779503 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-024-04639-1.


Innovations and Challenges in Implant-Free Breast Augmentation: Moving Towards Safer, Personalized Plastic Surgery.

Guo Q, Li W Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024; .

PMID: 38548958 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-024-04013-1.


Morphological Aesthetics Assessment of the Predicted 3D Simulation Results and the Actual Results of Breast Augmentation.

Zhou L, Hong W, Cao M, Zeng L, Peng T, Li X Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023; 48(4):568-579.

PMID: 37608189 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-023-03597-4.

References
1.
La Padula S, Hersant B, Noel W, Niddam J, Hermeziu O, Bouhassira J . Use of the retrograde limb of the internal mammary vein to avoid venous congestion in DIEP flap breast reconstruction: Further evidences of a reliable and time-sparing procedure. Microsurgery. 2016; 36(6):447-52. DOI: 10.1002/micr.30043. View

2.
Wisse A, Tryggvadottir H, Simonsson M, Isaksson K, Rose C, Ingvar C . Increasing preoperative body size in breast cancer patients between 2002 and 2016: implications for prognosis. Cancer Causes Control. 2018; 29(7):643-656. PMC: 5999186. DOI: 10.1007/s10552-018-1042-z. View

3.
La Padula S, Hersant B, SidAhmed M, Niddam J, Meningaud J . Objective estimation of patient age through a new composite scale for facial aging assessment: The face - Objective assessment scale. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016; 44(7):775-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.01.022. View

4.
Choudry U, Kim N . Preoperative assessment preferences and reported reoperation rates for size change in primary breast augmentation: a survey of ASPS members. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 130(6):1352-1359. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31826d9f66. View

5.
Vorstenbosch J, Islur A . Correlation of Prediction and Actual Outcome of Three-Dimensional Simulation in Breast Augmentation Using a Cloud-Based Program. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2017; 41(3):481-490. DOI: 10.1007/s00266-017-0830-2. View