» Articles » PMID: 35743477

Double-Balloon Kyphoplasty Results in Better Radiographic Outcomes Than a Single-Balloon Kyphoplasty in Treating Osteo-Porotic Spinal Fractures

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 Jun 24
PMID 35743477
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Studies have found that unilateral and bilateral kyphoplasty have comparable clinical outcomes. Only a few studies have compared the radiographic results of using unilateral vs. simultaneous bilateral approaches. We aimed to examine and compare the radiographic results of unilateral (UKP) vs. bilateral simultaneous double-balloon kyphoplasty (DKP) for treating symptomatic vertebral compression fractures (VCF).

Methods: A retrospective cohort of all patients treated for VCF by DKP and UKP over five years in a single medical center. From 2009 to 2012, we routinely performed UKP; from 2012, DKP was the routine due to potential benefits in vertebral realignment. We evaluated pre- and post-surgical fracture characteristics including vertebral height, sagittal and coronal Cobb angle, and fracture reduction. Statistical analysis included a -test for independent variables and Pearson's correlation.

Results: The study cohort consisted of 81 patients (75.8 years ± 10.86) who underwent surgery, with a total of 119 vertebras. We performed 89 UKP on fractured vertebras and 30 DKP on 30 vertebrae. The UKP average fluoroscopy radiation exposure was 15.8 mGy (±11.5) per level compared to 11.2 mGy (±8.7) for DKP, = 0.03. DKP showed significant fracture reduction, 2.8 degrees of Cobb angle, equaling the patient positioning effect on fracture reduction.

Conclusion: DKP results in better fracture reduction than UKP, and equals the effect of patient positioning without increased radiation exposure or adverse events.

Citing Articles

Comparison of unilateral and bilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures associated with scoliosis.

Liu Z, Li H, Tang Y, Liu H, Zhang J, Zou J Exp Ther Med. 2023; 26(1):335.

PMID: 37383374 PMC: 10294595. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2023.12034.

References
1.
Johnell O, Kanis J . An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2006; 17(12):1726-33. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-006-0172-4. View

2.
Lotan R, Smorgick Y, Anekstein Y, Rudik O, Prosso I, Hershkovich O . Kyphoplasty for Elderly Patients With Vertebral Compression Fractures-Do We Save Lives? Mortality Rates Analysis Comparison in a Long-Term Follow-Up Cohort. Global Spine J. 2021; 12(7):1443-1448. PMC: 9393975. DOI: 10.1177/2192568220982282. View

3.
Xiang G, Tong M, Lou C, Zhu S, Guo W, Ke C . The Role of Unilateral Balloon Kyphoplasty for the Treatment of Patients with OVCFS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pain Physician. 2018; 21(3):209-218. View

4.
Lee S, Chen J . Closed reduction vertebroplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Technical note. J Neurosurg. 2004; 100(4 Suppl Spine):392-6. DOI: 10.3171/spi.2004.100.4.0392. View

5.
Jarvik J, Kallmes D . Point of view. Efficacy of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009; 34(6):613-4. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819c1770. View