» Articles » PMID: 35741618

Effect of Ipsilateral, Contralateral or Bilateral Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Patients with Lateralized Tinnitus: A Placebo-Controlled Randomized Study

Overview
Journal Brain Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Jun 24
PMID 35741618
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The relative benefit of ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for tinnitus treatment remains unclear, especially for patients with lateralized tinnitus. In this study, we compared outcomes after 10 sessions of 1-Hz rTMS at 110% of resting motor threshold over a two-week period. In total, 104 right-handed patients with lateralized subjective tinnitus were randomly divided into four groups according to rTMS treatment: Left (n = 29), Right (n = 23), Bilateral (n = 30), and Sham stimulation (n = 22). Outcomes included estimates of tinnitus severity, psychological state, and psychoacoustic measures. Patients with left- or right-sided tinnitus were similarly distributed across treatment groups. There were no significant changes in outcome measures for the Right or Sham treatment groups. For the Left and Bilateral groups, tinnitus severity was significantly lower after treatment (p < 0.05). The reduction in tinnitus severity was largest for ipsilateral treatment in the Left group. The overall response rate was 56.1% for the Left group, 46.7% for the Bilateral group, 8.3% for the Right group, and 8.3% for the Sham group. For the Left and Bilateral groups, the response rate was larger for patients with left- than right-sided tinnitus. Changes in tinnitus severity were best predicted by changes in anxiety, depression, and the loudness of the tinnitus. The results suggests that rTMS on the left temporoparietal cortex is more effective for patients with left-sided than with right-sided tinnitus.

References
1.
Hiller W, Goebel G . When tinnitus loudness and annoyance are discrepant: audiological characteristics and psychological profile. Audiol Neurootol. 2007; 12(6):391-400. DOI: 10.1159/000106482. View

2.
Ridder D, Song J, Vanneste S . Frontal cortex TMS for tinnitus. Brain Stimul. 2012; 6(3):355-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2012.07.002. View

3.
Folmer R, Griest S, Martin W . Chronic tinnitus as phantom auditory pain. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001; 124(4):394-400. DOI: 10.1067/mhn.2001.114673. View

4.
Hullfish J, Sedley W, Vanneste S . Prediction and perception: Insights for (and from) tinnitus. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019; 102:1-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.04.008. View

5.
Julkunen P, Saisanen L, Danner N, Niskanen E, Hukkanen T, Mervaala E . Comparison of navigated and non-navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation for motor cortex mapping, motor threshold and motor evoked potentials. Neuroimage. 2008; 44(3):790-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.040. View