» Articles » PMID: 35741137

Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in Fetuses Detected with Isolated Cardiovascular Malformation: A Multicenter Study, Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2022 Jun 24
PMID 35741137
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cardiovascular malformations (CVM) represent the most common structural anomalies, occurring in 0.7% of live births. The CVM prenatal suspicion should prompt an accurate investigation with fetal echocardiography and the assessment through genetic counseling and testing. In particular, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) allows the identification of copy number variations. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature, studying the incremental diagnostic yield of CMA in fetal isolated CVM, scoring yields for each category of heart disease, with the aim of guiding genetic counseling and prenatal management. At the same time, we report 59 fetuses with isolated CVM with normal karyotype who underwent CMA. The incremental CMA diagnostic yield in fetuses with isolated CVM was 5.79% (CI 5.54-6.04), with conotruncal malformations showing the higher detection rate (15.93%). The yields for ventricular septal defects and aberrant right subclavian artery were the lowest (2.64% and 0.66%). Other CVM ranged from 4.42% to 6.67%. In the retrospective cohort, the diagnostic yield was consistent with literature data, with an overall CMA diagnostic yield of 3.38%. CMA in the prenatal setting was confirmed as a valuable tool for investigating the causes of fetal cardiovascular malformations.

Citing Articles

Uncovering potential causal genes for undiagnosed congenital anomalies using an in-house pipeline for trio-based whole-genome sequencing.

Kim J, Cho H, Shin D, Kim O, Kim J, Lee H Hum Genomics. 2025; 19(1):1.

PMID: 39762984 PMC: 11702056. DOI: 10.1186/s40246-024-00709-2.


Prenatal finding of isolated ventricular septal defect: genetic association, outcomes and counseling.

Chen X, Zhang Q, Lu M, Feng Q, Qin L, Liao S Front Genet. 2024; 15:1447216.

PMID: 39415979 PMC: 11479991. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1447216.


Prenatal genetic diagnosis associated with fetal ventricular septal defect: an assessment based on chromosomal microarray analysis and exome sequencing.

Wang Y, Li R, Fu F, Huang R, Li D, Liao C Front Genet. 2023; 14:1260995.

PMID: 38075692 PMC: 10704506. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1260995.


A Pain in the Neck: Lessons Learnt from Genetic Testing in Fetuses Detected with Nuchal Fluid Collections, Increased Nuchal Translucency versus Cystic Hygroma-Systematic Review of the Literature, Meta-Analysis and Case Series.

Mastromoro G, Guadagnolo D, Khaleghi Hashemian N, Bernardini L, Giancotti A, Piacentini G Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(1).

PMID: 36611340 PMC: 9818917. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13010048.

References
1.
Kowalczyk K, Bartnik-Glaska M, Smyk M, Plaskota I, Bernaciak J, Kedzior M . Prenatal Diagnosis by Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization in Fetuses with Cardiac Abnormalities. Genes (Basel). 2021; 12(12). PMC: 8701951. DOI: 10.3390/genes12122021. View

2.
Mone F, Eberhardt R, Morris R, Hurles M, Mcmullan D, Maher E . COngenital heart disease and the Diagnostic yield with Exome sequencing (CODE) study: prospective cohort study and systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 57(1):43-51. DOI: 10.1002/uog.22072. View

3.
Poot M, Verrijn Stuart A, van Daalen E, van Iperen A, van Binsbergen E, Hochstenbach R . Variable behavioural phenotypes of patients with monosomies of 15q26 and a review of 16 cases. Eur J Med Genet. 2013; 56(7):346-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2013.04.001. View

4.
Hillman S, Mcmullan D, Williams D, Maher E, Kilby M . Microarray comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis: a review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 40(4):385-91. DOI: 10.1002/uog.11180. View

5.
Bernhardt B, Soucier D, Hanson K, Savage M, Jackson L, Wapner R . Women's experiences receiving abnormal prenatal chromosomal microarray testing results. Genet Med. 2012; 15(2):139-45. PMC: 3877835. DOI: 10.1038/gim.2012.113. View