» Articles » PMID: 35737663

Predictability of Combined Cataract Surgery and Trabeculectomy Using Barrett Universal Ⅱ Formula

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2022 Jun 23
PMID 35737663
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To compare the predictability of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation using the Barrett Universal II and the SRK/T formulas in eyes undergoing combined cataract surgery and trabeculectomy.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical charts of 56 consecutive eyes undergoing cataract surgery and trabeculectomy. IOL power calculations were performed using the Barrett Universal II and SRK/T formulas. We compared the prediction error, the absolute error, and the percentages within ± 0.5 D and ±1.0 D of the targeted refraction, 3 months postoperatively, and also investigated the relationship of the prediction error with the keratometric readings and axial length, using the two formulas.

Results: The prediction error using the SRK/T formula was significantly more myopic than that using the Barrett Universal II formula (paired t-test, p<0.001). The absolute error using the Barrett Universal II formula was significantly smaller than that using the SRK/T formula (p = 0.039). We found significant correlations of the prediction error with the axial length (Pearson correlation coefficient, r = 0.273, p = 0.042), and the keratometric readings (r = -0.317, p = 0.017), using SRK/T formula, but no significant correlations between them (r = 0.219, p = 0.167, and r = -0.023, p = 0.870), using the Barrett Universal II formula.

Conclusions: The Barrett Universal II formula provides a better predictability of IOL power calculation and is less susceptible to the effect of the axial length and the corneal shape, than the SRK/T formula. The Barrett Universal formula, rather than the SRK/T formula, may be clinically helpful for improving the refractive accuracy in such eyes.

Citing Articles

Retraction: Predictability of combined cataract surgery and trabeculectomy using Barrett Universal Ⅱ formula.

Iijima K, Kamiya K, Iida Y, Kasahara M, Shoji N PLoS One. 2024; 19(6):e0305361.

PMID: 38843163 PMC: 11156357. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305361.


Anterior Segment Changes and Refractive Outcomes after Cataract Surgery Combined with Gonioscopy-Assisted Transluminal Trabeculotomy in Open-Angle Glaucoma.

Tekcan H, Imamoglu S, Mangan M Turk J Ophthalmol. 2023; 53(6):369-376.

PMID: 38047480 PMC: 10750090. DOI: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2023.36080.


Premium Intraocular Lenses in Glaucoma-A Systematic Review.

Hong A, Ang B, Dorairaj E, Dorairaj S Bioengineering (Basel). 2023; 10(9).

PMID: 37760095 PMC: 10525961. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10090993.


Factors Associated with Refractive Prediction Error after Phacotrabeculectomy.

Shin J, Kim S, Oh S, Lee K J Clin Med. 2023; 12(17).

PMID: 37685774 PMC: 10488334. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12175706.

References
1.
Reitblat O, Levy A, Kleinmann G, Lerman T, Assia E . Intraocular lens power calculation for eyes with high and low average keratometry readings: Comparison between various formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017; 43(9):1149-1156. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.06.036. View

2.
Abulafia A, Barrett G, Rotenberg M, Kleinmann G, Levy A, Reitblat O . Intraocular lens power calculation for eyes with an axial length greater than 26.0 mm: comparison of formulas and methods. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015; 41(3):548-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.06.033. View

3.
Cionni R, Dimalanta R, Breen M, Hamilton C . A large retrospective database analysis comparing outcomes of intraoperative aberrometry with conventional preoperative planning. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018; 44(10):1230-1235. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.07.016. View

4.
Faramarzi A, Aghajani A, Ghiasian L . Accuracy of Various Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Steep Corneas. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2017; 12(4):385-389. PMC: 5644404. DOI: 10.4103/jovr.jovr_20_17. View

5.
Melles R, Holladay J, Chang W . Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Calculation Formulas. Ophthalmology. 2017; 125(2):169-178. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.08.027. View