» Articles » PMID: 35737061

Genotoxicity of 12 Mycotoxins by the SOS/umu Test: Comparison of Liver and Kidney S9 Fraction

Overview
Journal Toxins (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Toxicology
Date 2022 Jun 23
PMID 35737061
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Liver S9 fraction is usually employed in mutagenicity/genotoxicity in vitro assays, but some genotoxic compounds may need another type of bioactivation. In the present work, an alternative S9 fraction from the kidneys was used for the genotoxicity assessment of 12 mycotoxins with the SOS/umu test. The results were compared with liver S9 fraction, and 2-4 independent experiments were performed with each mycotoxin. The expected results were obtained with positive controls (4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide and 2-aminoanthracene) without metabolic activation or with liver S9, but a potent dose-dependent effect with 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide and no activity of 2-aminoanthracene with kidney S9 were noticed. Aflatoxin B1 was genotoxic with metabolic activation, the effect being greater with liver S9. Sterigmatocystin was clearly genotoxic with liver S9 but equivocal with kidney S9. Ochratoxin A, zearalenone and fumonisin B1 were negative in all conditions. Trichothecenes were negative, except for nivalenol, 3-acetyldeoxynivalenol, 15-acetyldeoxynivalenol, T-2 and HT-2 toxins, which showed equivocal results with kidney S9 because a clear dose-response effect was not observed. Most of the mycotoxins have been assessed with kidney S9 and the SOS/umu test for the first time here. The results with the positive controls and the mycotoxins confirm that the organ used for the S9 fraction preparation has an influence on the genotoxic activity of some compounds.

Citing Articles

In Vivo Genotoxicity and Toxicity Assessment of Sterigmatocystin Individually and in Mixture with Aflatoxin B1.

Alonso-Jauregui M, Lopez de Cerain A, Azqueta A, Rodriguez-Garraus A, Gil A, Gonzalez-Penas E Toxins (Basel). 2023; 15(8).

PMID: 37624248 PMC: 10467059. DOI: 10.3390/toxins15080491.


Assessment of the Cytotoxicity, Mutagenicity, and Genotoxicity of Two Traditional Chinese Herbs: and .

Poivre M, Antoine M, Kryshen K, Atsapkina A, Shikov A, Twyffels L Toxins (Basel). 2023; 15(1).

PMID: 36668872 PMC: 9864762. DOI: 10.3390/toxins15010052.

References
1.
Hamer B, Bihari N, Reifferscheid G, Zahn R, Muller W, Batel R . Evaluation of the SOS/umu-test post-treatment assay for the detection of genotoxic activities of pure compounds and complex environmental mixtures. Mutat Res. 2000; 466(2):161-71. DOI: 10.1016/s1383-5718(00)00016-4. View

2.
Phillipson C, Ioannides C . Activation of aromatic amines to mutagens by various animal species including man. Mutat Res. 1983; 124(3-4):325-36. DOI: 10.1016/0165-1218(83)90203-3. View

3.
Takakura N, Nesslany F, Fessard V, Hegarat L . Absence of in vitro genotoxicity potential of the mycotoxin deoxynivalenol in bacteria and in human TK6 and HepaRG cell lines. Food Chem Toxicol. 2014; 66:113-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2014.01.029. View

4.
Brendt J, Crawford S, Velki M, Xiao H, Thalmann B, Hollert H . Is a liver comparable to a liver? A comparison of different rat-derived S9-fractions with a biotechnological animal-free alternative in the Ames fluctuation assay. Sci Total Environ. 2020; 759:143522. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143522. View

5.
Oda Y, Funasaka K, Kitano M, Nakama A, Yoshikura T . Use of a high-throughput umu-microplate test system for rapid detection of genotoxicity produced by mutagenic carcinogens and airborne particulate matter. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2004; 43(1):10-9. DOI: 10.1002/em.10209. View