» Articles » PMID: 35734034

Double Plating in Type C Distal Humerus Fractures: Current Treatment Options and Factors That Affect the Outcome

Overview
Date 2022 Jun 23
PMID 35734034
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: This is a retrospective cohort study of type C distal humeral fractures (AO classification system) aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of current operative treatment options.

Materials And Methods: Thirty-seven patients with type C distal humeral fractures, treated operatively from January 2002 to September 2016, were retrospectively studied. Thirty-two were eligible for inclusion. Patients were treated by open reduction using the posterior approach, olecranon osteotomy and parallel-plate two-column internal fixation. Patients were evaluated for fracture healing, functional outcomes and complications (infection, ulnar neuropathy, heterotopic ossification and need for implant removal). Restoration of the normal anatomy was defined by measuring carrying angle, posterior angulation and intercondylar distance of distal humerus.

Results: The mean follow-up time was 8.7 years [range 2-15.5 years, standard deviation (SD) = 3.96]. Mean time to fracture union was 8 weeks for 29 patients (90.6%) (range, 6-10 weeks). In nine cases, there was malunion of varied importance (28.1%). There was one case with postoperative ulnar neuropathy and one case with deep infection. The mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score and mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) were 20 (range 0-49) and 83.3 (range 25-100), respectively.

Conclusion: In complex distal humerus fractures, the posterior approach with olecranon osteotomy and parallel plating of two columns, after anatomic reconstruction of the articular segment, is a prerequisite for successful elbow function.

How To Cite This Article: Athanaselis ED, Komnos G, Deligeorgis D, . Double Plating in Type C Distal Humerus Fractures: Current Treatment Options and Factors that Affect the Outcome. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2022;17(1):7-13.

Citing Articles

Medial minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for humeral shaft fractures: a case series.

Liu D, Liang J Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023; 85(6):3171-3178.

PMID: 37363563 PMC: 10289522. DOI: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000852.


Efficacy and safety of anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve for distal humerus fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Li T, Yan J, Ren Q, Hu J, Wang F, Xiao C Front Surg. 2023; 9:1005200.

PMID: 36684340 PMC: 9853443. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1005200.


Combined use of minimal screw synthesis and external articulated fixation is effective for the management of supra-intercondyloid humeral fractures in the elderly? A retrospective study.

Bienati F, Isola A, Ortu S, Bonini L, Sirianni R, Capone A J Orthop. 2022; 34:331-338.

PMID: 36210959 PMC: 9535269. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.09.011.

References
1.
McCarty L, Ring D, Jupiter J . Management of distal humerus fractures. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2005; 34(9):430-8. View

2.
Ali A, Douglas H, Stanley D . Revision surgery for nonunion after early failure of fixation of fractures of the distal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005; 87(8):1107-10. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B8.15610. View

3.
Kaiser T, Brunner A, Hohendorff B, Ulmar B, Babst R . Treatment of supra- and intra-articular fractures of the distal humerus with the LCP Distal Humerus Plate: a 2-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010; 20(2):206-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.06.010. View

4.
Horne G . Supracondylar fractures of the humerus in adults. J Trauma. 1980; 20(1):71-4. View

5.
Ring D, Jupiter J, Gulotta L . Articular fractures of the distal part of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85(2):232-8. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200302000-00008. View