» Articles » PMID: 35732244

Cross-attractor Repertoire Provides New Perspective on Structure-function Relationship in the Brain

Overview
Journal Neuroimage
Specialty Radiology
Date 2022 Jun 22
PMID 35732244
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The brain exhibits complex intrinsic dynamics, i.e., spontaneously arising activity patterns without any external inputs or tasks. Such intrinsic dynamics and their alteration are thought to play crucial roles in typical as well as atypical cognitive functioning. Linking the ever-changing intrinsic dynamics to the rather static anatomy is a challenging endeavor. Dynamical systems models are important tools for understanding how structure and function are linked in the brain. Here, we provide a novel modeling framework to examine how functional connectivity depends on structural connectivity in the brain. Existing modeling frameworks typically focus on noise-driven (or stochastic) dynamics near a single attractor. Complementing existing approaches, we examine deterministic features of the distribution of attractors, in particular, how regional states are correlated across all attractors - cross-attractor coordination. We found that cross-attractor coordination between brain regions better predicts human functional connectivity than noise-driven single-attractor dynamics. Importantly, cross-attractor coordination better accounts for the nonlinear dependency of functional connectivity on structural connectivity. Our findings suggest that functional connectivity patterns in the brain may reflect transitions between attractors, which impose an energy cost. The framework may be used to predict transitions and energy costs associated with experimental or clinical interventions.

Citing Articles

Deconstructing the Mapper algorithm to extract richer topological and temporal features from functional neuroimaging data.

Hasegan D, Geniesse C, Chowdhury S, Saggar M Netw Neurosci. 2024; 8(4):1355-1382.

PMID: 39735492 PMC: 11675014. DOI: 10.1162/netn_a_00403.


Cortical network reconfiguration aligns with shifts of basal ganglia and cerebellar influence.

Nestor K, Rasero J, Betzel R, Gianaros P, Verstynen T ArXiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39184535 PMC: 11343224.


Deconstructing the Mapper algorithm to extract richer topological and temporal features from functional neuroimaging data.

Hasegan D, Geniesse C, Chowdhury S, Saggar M bioRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 37904918 PMC: 10614807. DOI: 10.1101/2023.10.13.562304.


Controlling brain dynamics: Landscape and transition path for working memory.

Ye L, Feng J, Li C PLoS Comput Biol. 2023; 19(9):e1011446.

PMID: 37669311 PMC: 10503743. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011446.


Cross-attractor modeling of resting-state functional connectivity in psychiatric disorders.

Sun Y, Zhang M, Saggar M Neuroimage. 2023; 279:120302.

PMID: 37579998 PMC: 10515743. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120302.


References
1.
Fox M, Snyder A, Zacks J, Raichle M . Coherent spontaneous activity accounts for trial-to-trial variability in human evoked brain responses. Nat Neurosci. 2005; 9(1):23-5. DOI: 10.1038/nn1616. View

2.
Abbott L, Chance F . Drivers and modulators from push-pull and balanced synaptic input. Prog Brain Res. 2005; 149:147-55. DOI: 10.1016/S0079-6123(05)49011-1. View

3.
Wilson H, Cowan J . A mathematical theory of the functional dynamics of cortical and thalamic nervous tissue. Kybernetik. 1973; 13(2):55-80. DOI: 10.1007/BF00288786. View

4.
Smith S, Beckmann C, Andersson J, Auerbach E, Bijsterbosch J, Douaud G . Resting-state fMRI in the Human Connectome Project. Neuroimage. 2013; 80:144-68. PMC: 3720828. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.039. View

5.
Honey C, Sporns O, Cammoun L, Gigandet X, Thiran J, Meuli R . Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106(6):2035-40. PMC: 2634800. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0811168106. View