Psychometric Properties of the Emotional Processing Scale in Individuals with Psychiatric Symptoms and the Development of a Brief 15-item Version

Overview

Journal Sci Rep

Specialty Science

Date 2022 Jun 21

PMID 35729355

Authors

Daniel Maroti

Erland Axelsson

Brjann Ljotsson

Gerhard Andersson

Mark A Lumley

Robert Johansson

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The 25-item Emotional Processing Scale (EPS) can be used with clinical populations, but there is little research on its psychometric properties (factor structure, test-retest reliability, and validity) in individuals with psychiatric symptoms. We administered the EPS-25 to a large sample of people (N = 512) with elevated psychiatric symptoms. We used confirmatory factor analysis to evaluate three a priori models from previous research and then evaluated discriminant and convergent validity against measures of alexithymia (Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20), depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionaire-9), and anxiety symptoms (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7). None of the a priori models achieved acceptable fit, and subsequent exploratory factor analysis did not yield a clear factor solution for the 25 items. A 5-factor model did, however, achieve acceptable fit when we retained only 15 items, and this solution was replicated in a validation sample. Convergent and discriminant validity for this revised version, the EPS-15, was r = - 0.19 to 0.46 vs. TAS-20, r = 0.07- 0.25 vs. PHQ-9, and r = 0.29- 0.57 vs. GAD-7. Test-retest reliability was acceptable (ICC = 0.73). This study strengthens the case for the reliability and validity of the 5-factor structure of the EPS but suggest that only 15 items should be retained. Future studies should further examine the reliability and validity of the EPS-15.

References

Spitzer R, Kroenke K, Williams J, Lowe B . A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006; 166(10):1092-7. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092. View

Maroti D, Ek J, Widlund R, Schubiner H, Lumley M, Lilliengren P . Internet-Administered Emotional Awareness and Expression Therapy for Somatic Symptom Disorder With Centralized Symptoms: A Preliminary Efficacy Trial. Front Psychiatry. 2021; 12:620359. PMC: 7928393. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.620359. View

Lundh L, Torestad B, Bagby R, Taylor G, Parker J . A Swedish translation of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale: cross-validation of the factor structure. Scand J Psychol. 2000; 41(1):25-30. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9450.00167. View

Johansson R, Bjorklund M, Hornborg C, Karlsson S, Hesser H, Ljotsson B . Affect-focused psychodynamic psychotherapy for depression and anxiety through the Internet: a randomized controlled trial. PeerJ. 2013; 1:e102. PMC: 3709106. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.102. View

Rachman S . Emotional processing. Behav Res Ther. 1980; 18(1):51-60. DOI: 10.1016/0005-7967(80)90069-8. View

Esteves J, Wheatley L, Mayall C, Abbey H . Emotional processing and its relationship to chronic low back pain: results from a case-control study. Man Ther. 2013; 18(6):541-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2013.05.008. View

Bagby R, Taylor G, Parker J . The Twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale--II. Convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity. J Psychosom Res. 1994; 38(1):33-40. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3999(94)90006-x. View

Maroti D, Lumley M, Schubiner H, Lilliengren P, Bileviciute-Ljungar I, Ljotsson B . Internet-based emotional awareness and expression therapy for somatic symptom disorder: A randomized controlled trial. J Psychosom Res. 2022; 163:111068. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.111068. View

Baker R, Thomas S, Thomas P, Owens M . Development of an emotional processing scale. J Psychosom Res. 2007; 62(2):167-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.09.005. View

10.

Kroenke K, Spitzer R, Williams J, Lowe B . The Patient Health Questionnaire Somatic, Anxiety, and Depressive Symptom Scales: a systematic review. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2010; 32(4):345-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2010.03.006. View

11.

Novakova B, Howlett S, Baker R, Reuber M . Emotion processing and psychogenic non-epileptic seizures: A cross-sectional comparison of patients and healthy controls. Seizure. 2015; 29:4-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2015.03.007. View

12.

Phillips K, Wright B, Kent S . Psychosocial predictors of irritable bowel syndrome diagnosis and symptom severity. J Psychosom Res. 2013; 75(5):467-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.08.002. View

13.

Williams I, Howlett S, Levita L, Reuber M . Changes in Emotion Processing following Brief Augmented Psychodynamic Interpersonal Therapy for Functional Neurological Symptoms. Behav Cogn Psychother. 2018; 46(3):350-366. DOI: 10.1017/S1352465817000807. View

14.

McRae K, Gross J . Emotion regulation. Emotion. 2020; 20(1):1-9. DOI: 10.1037/emo0000703. View

15.

Baker R, Owens M, Thomas S, Whittlesea A, Abbey G, Gower P . Does CBT facilitate emotional processing?. Behav Cogn Psychother. 2011; 40(1):19-37. DOI: 10.1017/S1352465810000895. View

16.

Kharamin S, Malekzadeh M, Aria A, Ashraf H, Ghafarian Shirazi H . Emotional Processing In Patients with Ischemic Heart Diseases. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018; 6(9):1627-1632. PMC: 6182535. DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2018.325. View

17.

Guadagnoli E, Velicer W . Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychol Bull. 1988; 103(2):265-275. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.265. View

18.

Bagby R, Parker J, Taylor G . The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale--I. Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure. J Psychosom Res. 1994; 38(1):23-32. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3999(94)90005-1. View

19.

Sifneos P . Affect, emotional conflict, and deficit: an overview. Psychother Psychosom. 1991; 56(3):116-22. DOI: 10.1159/000288543. View

20.

Gay M, Bungener C, Thomas S, Vrignaud P, Thomas P, Baker R . Anxiety, emotional processing and depression in people with multiple sclerosis. BMC Neurol. 2017; 17(1):43. PMC: 5324294. DOI: 10.1186/s12883-017-0803-8. View