» Articles » PMID: 35727109

Distal Radioulnar Joint Kinematics Before Surgery and 12 Months Following Open Foveal Reinsertion of the Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex: Comparison with the Contralateral Non-injured Joint

Overview
Journal Acta Orthop
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2022 Jun 21
PMID 35727109
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Purpose: Foveal triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) lesion may cause distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability. Dynamic radiostereometry (dRSA) has been validated for objective measurement of DRUJ kinematics. We evaluated DRUJ kinematics by dRSA before surgery and 12 months following open foveal reinsertion of the TFCC in comparison with contralateral non-injured DRUJs.

Patients And Methods: In a prospective cohort study, 21 patients (11 men) of mean age 34 years (22-50) with arthroscopically confirmed foveal TFCC lesion were evaluated preoperatively, and at 6 and 12 months after open foveal TFCC reinsertion with QDASH, PRWE, pain on NRS, and bilateral dRSA imaging during a patient active press test motion cycle, including a force-loaded downstroke and a release phase.

Results: Preoperatively, the force-loaded part (> 2.3 kg; 95% CI 1.6-3.0) of the press test motion cycle (from 15% to 75%) revealed a more volar position of the ulnar head in the sigmoid notch (DRUJ position ratio) and increased distance in DRUJs with foveal TFCC lesion compared with the patients' contralateral non-injured DRUJ (p < 0.05). 6 months postoperatively, the DRUJ position was generally normalized and remained normalized at 12 months. However, the DRUJ distance remained higher on the injured side. 12 months postoperatively, patients reported less pain during activities, with improved QDASH and PRWE scores (p < 0.007).

Interpretation: DRUJ kinematics during the press test showed increased DRUJ translation to a more volar position of the ulnar head after foveal TFCC lesion compared with the contralateral non-injured DRUJs. Open foveal TFCC reinsertion had a stabilizing effect on DRUJ kinematics towards normalization, and improved patient-reported outcomes 6 and 12 months after surgery.

Citing Articles

Radial head arthroplasty diameter impact on elbow kinematics evaluated by dynamic radiostereometric analysis.

Teilmann J, Petersen E, Thillemann T, Hemmingsen C, Kipp J, Stilling M J Exp Orthop. 2024; 11(3):e12092.

PMID: 39119048 PMC: 11306918. DOI: 10.1002/jeo2.12092.


Reproduction of forearm rotation dynamic using intensity-based biplane 2D-3D registration matching method.

Shiode R, Miyamura S, Kazui A, Yamamoto N, Miyake T, Iwahashi T Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):5518.

PMID: 38448504 PMC: 10918057. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-55956-z.

References
1.
Kleinman W . Stability of the distal radioulna joint: biomechanics, pathophysiology, physical diagnosis, and restoration of function what we have learned in 25 years. J Hand Surg Am. 2007; 32(7):1086-106. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.06.014. View

2.
Iida A, Omokawa S, Moritomo H, Omori S, Kataoka T, Aoki M . Effect of wrist position on distal radioulnar joint stability: a biomechanical study. J Orthop Res. 2014; 32(10):1247-51. DOI: 10.1002/jor.22669. View

3.
Iida A, Omokawa S, Akahane M, Kawamura K, Takayama K, Tanaka Y . Distal radioulnar joint stress radiography for detecting radioulnar ligament injury. J Hand Surg Am. 2012; 37(5):968-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.01.041. View

4.
Pickering G, Nagata H, Giddins G . In-vivo three-dimensional measurement of distal radioulnar joint translation in normal and clinically unstable populations. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2016; 41(5):521-6. DOI: 10.1177/1753193415618110. View

5.
Hagert C . The distal radioulnar joint in relation to the whole forearm. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992; (275):56-64. View