» Articles » PMID: 35721859

An Algorithm for Accurate Marker-Based Gait Event Detection in Healthy and Pathological Populations During Complex Motor Tasks

Abstract

There is growing interest in the quantification of gait as part of complex motor tasks. This requires gait events (GEs) to be detected under conditions different from straight walking. This study aimed to propose and validate a new marker-based GE detection method, which is also suitable for curvilinear walking and step negotiation. The method was first tested against existing algorithms using data from healthy young adults (YA, = 20) and then assessed in data from 10 individuals from the following five cohorts: older adults, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, and proximal femur fracture. The propagation of the errors associated with GE detection on the calculation of stride length, duration, speed, and stance/swing durations was investigated. All participants performed a variety of motor tasks including curvilinear walking and step negotiation, while reference GEs were identified using a validated methodology exploiting pressure insole signals. Sensitivity, positive predictive values (PPV), F1-score, bias, precision, and accuracy were calculated. Absolute agreement [intraclass correlation coefficient ( )] between marker-based and pressure insole stride parameters was also tested. In the YA cohort, the proposed method outperformed the existing ones, with sensitivity, PPV, and F1 scores ≥ 99% for both GEs and conditions, with a virtually null bias (<10 ms). Overall, temporal inaccuracies minimally impacted stride duration, length, and speed (median absolute errors ≤1%). Similar algorithm performances were obtained for all the other five cohorts in GE detection and propagation to the stride parameters, where an excellent absolute agreement with the pressure insoles was also found ( ). In conclusion, the proposed method accurately detects GE from marker data under different walking conditions and for a variety of gait impairments.

Citing Articles

Automatic gait EVENT detection in older adults during perturbed walking.

Wang S, Omar K, Miranda F, Bhatt T J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025; 22(1):40.

PMID: 40022199 PMC: 11869663. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-025-01560-9.


Clinical Whole-Body Gait Characterization Using a Single RGB-D Sensor.

Boborzi L, Bertram J, Schniepp R, Decker J, Wuehr M Sensors (Basel). 2025; 25(2).

PMID: 39860703 PMC: 11768405. DOI: 10.3390/s25020333.


Precision Balance Assessment in Parkinson's Disease: Utilizing Vision-Based 3D Pose Tracking for Pull Test Analysis.

Ellrich N, Niermeyer K, Peto D, Decker J, Fietzek U, Katzdobler S Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(11).

PMID: 38894463 PMC: 11175242. DOI: 10.3390/s24113673.


Ecological validity of a deep learning algorithm to detect gait events from real-life walking bouts in mobility-limiting diseases.

Romijnders R, Salis F, Hansen C, Kuderle A, Paraschiv-Ionescu A, Cereatti A Front Neurol. 2023; 14:1247532.

PMID: 37909030 PMC: 10615212. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1247532.


Assessing real-world gait with digital technology? Validation, insights and recommendations from the Mobilise-D consortium.

Encarna Mico-Amigo M, Bonci T, Paraschiv-Ionescu A, Ullrich M, Kirk C, Soltani A J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023; 20(1):78.

PMID: 37316858 PMC: 10265910. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-023-01198-5.


References
1.
Visscher R, Sansgiri S, Freslier M, Harlaar J, Brunner R, Taylor W . Towards validation and standardization of automatic gait event identification algorithms for use in paediatric pathological populations. Gait Posture. 2021; 86:64-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.02.031. View

2.
Filtjens B, Nieuwboer A, DCruz N, Spildooren J, Slaets P, Vanrumste B . A data-driven approach for detecting gait events during turning in people with Parkinson's disease and freezing of gait. Gait Posture. 2020; 80:130-136. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.05.026. View

3.
van Uden C, Besser M . Test-retest reliability of temporal and spatial gait characteristics measured with an instrumented walkway system (GAITRite). BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2004; 5:13. PMC: 420245. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-5-13. View

4.
El-Gohary M, Pearson S, McNames J, Mancini M, Horak F, Mellone S . Continuous monitoring of turning in patients with movement disability. Sensors (Basel). 2014; 14(1):356-69. PMC: 3926561. DOI: 10.3390/s140100356. View

5.
Nightingale C, Mitchell S, Butterfield S . Validation of the Timed Up and Go Test for Assessing Balance Variables in Adults Aged 65 and Older. J Aging Phys Act. 2018; 27(2):230-233. DOI: 10.1123/japa.2018-0049. View