» Articles » PMID: 35715496

Comparative Metagenomics Reveals Expanded Insights into Intra- and Interspecific Variation Among Wild Bee Microbiomes

Overview
Journal Commun Biol
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 Jun 17
PMID 35715496
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The holobiont approach proposes that species are most fully understood within the context of their associated microbiomes, and that both host and microbial community are locked in a mutual circuit of co-evolutionary selection. Bees are an ideal group for this approach, as they comprise a critical group of pollinators that contribute to both ecological and agricultural health worldwide. Metagenomic analyses offer comprehensive insights into an organism's microbiome, diet, and viral load, but remain largely unapplied to wild bees. Here, we present metagenomic data from three species of carpenter bees sampled from around the globe, representative of the first ever carpenter bee core microbiome. Machine learning, co-occurrence, and network analyses reveal that wild bee metagenomes are unique to host species. Further, we find that microbiomes are likely strongly affected by features of their local environment, and feature evidence of plant pathogens previously known only in honey bees. Performing the most comprehensive comparative analysis of bee microbiomes to date we discover that microbiome diversity is inversely proportional to host species social complexity. Our study helps to establish some of the first wild bee hologenomic data while offering powerful empirical insights into the biology and health of vital pollinators.

Citing Articles

Direct and indirect effects of land use on microbiomes of trap-nesting solitary bee larvae and nests.

Peters B, Leonhardt S, Schloter M, Keller A Front Microbiol. 2025; 15():1513096.

PMID: 39845038 PMC: 11753253. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1513096.


Host species and geography impact bee-associated RNA virus communities with evidence for isolation by distance in viral populations.

Robinson C, Dolezal A, Newton I ISME Commun. 2024; 4(1):ycad003.

PMID: 38304079 PMC: 10833078. DOI: 10.1093/ismeco/ycad003.


Influence of social lifestyles on host-microbe symbioses in the bees.

Mee L, Barribeau S Ecol Evol. 2023; 13(11):e10679.

PMID: 37928198 PMC: 10620586. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.10679.


The effects of maternal care on the developmental transcriptome and metatranscriptome of a wild bee.

Chau K, Shamekh M, Huisken J, Rehan S Commun Biol. 2023; 6(1):904.

PMID: 37709905 PMC: 10502028. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-05275-2.


Draft genome sequences of sp. strains QMID1-QMID4 isolated from the midgut of Japanese honey bee ().

Suzuki A, Nakajima N, Sakamoto Y Microbiol Resour Announc. 2023; 12(9):e0001023.

PMID: 37493581 PMC: 10508173. DOI: 10.1128/MRA.00010-23.


References
1.
Klein A, Vaissiere B, Cane J, Steffan-Dewenter I, Cunningham S, Kremen C . Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proc Biol Sci. 2006; 274(1608):303-13. PMC: 1702377. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3721. View

2.
Furst M, McMahon D, Osborne J, Paxton R, Brown M . Disease associations between honeybees and bumblebees as a threat to wild pollinators. Nature. 2014; 506(7488):364-6. PMC: 3985068. DOI: 10.1038/nature12977. View

3.
Koch H, Abrol D, Li J, Schmid-Hempel P . Diversity and evolutionary patterns of bacterial gut associates of corbiculate bees. Mol Ecol. 2013; 22(7):2028-44. DOI: 10.1111/mec.12209. View

4.
McFrederick Q, Wcislo W, Taylor D, Ishak H, Dowd S, Mueller U . Environment or kin: whence do bees obtain acidophilic bacteria?. Mol Ecol. 2012; 21(7):1754-68. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05496.x. View

5.
McFrederick Q, Wcislo W, Hout M, Mueller U . Host species and developmental stage, but not host social structure, affects bacterial community structure in socially polymorphic bees. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2014; 88(2):398-406. DOI: 10.1111/1574-6941.12302. View