» Articles » PMID: 35712900

Reduction of Instrumentation-Related Spine Surgical Site Infections After Optimization of Surgical Techniques. A Single Center Retrospective Analysis

Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Objective: Although surgical risk factors for developing spine surgical site infections (S-SSI) have been identified, the impact of such knowledge in its prevention has not been demonstrated.

Methods: We evaluated in 500 patients undergoing spine surgery between 2011 and 2019 at Hospital 12 de Octubre the changes in S-SSI rates over time. Surgical variables independently related to S-SSI were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis using binary logistic regression models. A case-control sub-analysis (1:4), matched by the surgical variables identified in the overall cohort was also performed.

Results: Twenty cases of S-SSI were identified (4%), with a significant decrease in the incidence rate across consecutive time periods (6.6% [2011-2014] vs .86% [2015-2019]; -value <.0001)). Multivariate analysis identified arthrodesis involving sacral levels (odds ratio [OR]: 2.57; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.02-6.47; value = .044) and instrumentation over 4-8 vertebrae (OR: 2.82; 95%CI: 1.1-7.1; value .027) as independent risk factors for S-SSI. The reduction in the incidence of S-SSI concurred temporally with a reduction in instrumentations involving 4-8 vertebrae (55% vs 21.8%; value <.0001) and sacral vertebrae (46.9% vs 24.6%; -value <.0001) across both periods. The case-control analysis matched by these surgical variables failed to identify other factors independently related to the occurrence of S-SSI.

Conclusions: Spinal fusion of more than 4 levels and the inclusion of sacral levels were independently related to the risk of S-SSI. Optimization of surgical techniques by reducing these two types of instrumentation could significantly reduce S-SSI rates.

References
1.
Shiels S, Raut V, Patterson P, Barnes B, Wenke J . Antibiotic-loaded bone graft for reduction of surgical site infection in spinal fusion. Spine J. 2017; 17(12):1917-1925. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.06.039. View

2.
Abdul-Jabbar A, Takemoto S, Weber M, Hu S, Mummaneni P, Deviren V . Surgical site infection in spinal surgery: description of surgical and patient-based risk factors for postoperative infection using administrative claims data. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012; 37(15):1340-5. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318246a53a. View

3.
Nunez-Pereira S, Pellise F, Rodriguez-Pardo D, Pigrau C, Sanchez J, Bago J . Individualized antibiotic prophylaxis reduces surgical site infections by gram-negative bacteria in instrumented spinal surgery. Eur Spine J. 2011; 20 Suppl 3:397-402. PMC: 3175827. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1906-3. View

4.
Lemans J, Wijdicks S, Boot W, Govaert G, Houwert R, Oner F . Intrawound Treatment for Prevention of Surgical Site Infections in Instrumented Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Comparative Effectiveness Review and Meta-Analysis. Global Spine J. 2019; 9(2):219-230. PMC: 6448203. DOI: 10.1177/2192568218786252. View

5.
Buser Z, Brodke D, Youssef J, Meisel H, Myhre S, Hashimoto R . Synthetic bone graft versus autograft or allograft for spinal fusion: a systematic review. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016; 25(4):509-516. DOI: 10.3171/2016.1.SPINE151005. View