» Articles » PMID: 35712356

Increasing the Low-risk Threshold for Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding During the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Prospective, Multicentre Feasibility Study

Abstract

Objective: During the COVID-19 pandemic, we extended the low-risk threshold for patients not requiring inpatient endoscopy for upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) from Glasgow Blatchford Score (GBS) 0-1 to GBS 0-3. We studied the safety and efficacy of this change.

Methods: Between 1 April 2020 and 30 June 2020 we prospectively collected data on consecutive unselected patients with UGIB at five large Scottish hospitals. Primary outcomes were length of stay, 30-day mortality and rebleeding. We compared the results with prospective prepandemic descriptive data.

Results: 397 patients were included, and 284 index endoscopies were performed. 26.4% of patients had endoscopic intervention at index endoscopy. 30-day all-cause mortality was 13.1% (53/397), and 33.3% (23/69) for pre-existing inpatients. Bleeding-related mortality was 5% (20/397). 30-day rebleeding rate was 6.3% (25/397). 84 patients had GBS 0-3, of whom 19 underwent inpatient endoscopy, 0 had rebleeding and 2 died. Compared with prepandemic data in three centres, there was a fall in mean number of UGIB presentations per week (19 vs 27.8; p=0.004), higher mean GBS (8.3 vs 6.5; p<0.001) with fewer GBS 0-3 presentations (21.5% vs 33.3%; p=0.003) and higher all-cause mortality (12.2% vs 6.8%; p=0.02). Predictors of mortality were cirrhosis, pre-existing inpatient status, age >70 and confirmed COVID-19. 14 patients were COVID-19 positive, 5 died but none from UGIB.

Conclusion: During the pandemic when services were under severe pressure, extending the low-risk threshold for UGIB inpatient endoscopy to GBS 0-3 appears safe. The higher mortality of patients with UGIB during the pandemic is likely due to presentation of a fewer low-risk patients.

Citing Articles

A Review of Risk Scores within Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

Orpen-Palmer J, Stanley A J Clin Med. 2023; 12(11).

PMID: 37297873 PMC: 10253886. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12113678.

References
1.
Stanley A, Dalton H, Blatchford O, Ashley D, Mowat C, Cahill A . Multicentre comparison of the Glasgow Blatchford and Rockall Scores in the prediction of clinical end-points after upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011; 34(4):470-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04747.x. View

2.
Hayee B, Thoufeeq M, Rees C, Penman I, East J . Safely restarting GI endoscopy in the era of COVID-19. Gut. 2020; 69(12):2063-2070. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321688. View

3.
de Groot N, van Oijen M, Kessels K, Hemmink M, Weusten B, Timmer R . Prediction scores or gastroenterologists' Gut Feeling for triaging patients that present with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. United European Gastroenterol J. 2014; 2(3):197-205. PMC: 4212458. DOI: 10.1177/2050640614531574. View

4.
Jairath V, Thompson J, Kahan B, Daniel R, Hearnshaw S, Travis S . Poor outcomes in hospitalized patients with gastrointestinal bleeding: impact of baseline risk, bleeding severity, and process of care. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014; 109(10):1603-12. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2014.263. View

5.
Chiu P, Ng S, Inoue H, Reddy D, Ling Hu E, Cho J . Practice of endoscopy during COVID-19 pandemic: position statements of the Asian Pacific Society for Digestive Endoscopy (APSDE-COVID statements). Gut. 2020; 69(6):991-996. PMC: 7211066. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321185. View