» Articles » PMID: 35711899

The Utility of the Oncotype DX Test for Breast Cancer Patients in an Australian Multidisciplinary Setting

Overview
Journal Breast J
Publisher Wiley
Date 2022 Jun 17
PMID 35711899
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The Oncotype DX test is a genomic assay that generates a Recurrence Score (RS) predicting the 10-year risk of recurrence and response to adjuvant chemotherapy in ER+/HER2- breast cancer patients. The aims were to determine breast cancer distant recurrence and correlate with adjuvant chemoendocrine prescribing patterns based on the Oncotype DX recurrence score.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-institution case series of 71 patients who had Oncotype DX assay testing after definitive surgery between 2012 and 2016. Both node-positive and node-negative patients were included. Patients were divided into Oncotype DX low risk (RS < 11) (n = 10, 14%), intermediate risk (RS 11-25) (n = 45, 63%), and high risk (RS > 25) (n = 16, 23%). Median follow-up was 6.1 years (range 4-8.9 years). Adjuvant treatment regimens and oncological outcomes were determined. Mean age at diagnosis was 56 years (range, 33-77). Invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) accounted for the majority (87%), with most tumors measuring between 10-20 mm (52%). 48% of the cohort were node positive. 15 of 16 high-risk patients (94%) received chemotherapy. 96% of intermediate-risk patients received endocrine therapy alone, one patient received chemoendocrine therapy (2%), and one declined systemic therapy (2%). In the low-risk group, 100% received endocrine therapy only. The high-risk group had the lowest mean ER% ( < 0.05), greatest mean mitotic rate ( < 0.05), and greatest proportion of Ki67% > 14. Five patients developed distant recurrence (7%): three from the intermediate-risk group (7%), one from the low-risk group (10%), and one from the high-risk group (6%).

Conclusion: This is the first Australian study reporting the experience with medium-term recurrence outcomes of using the Oncotype DX assay in breast cancer. Chemotherapy was rarely given for patients with low-to-intermediate RS and always offered in high RS. This pattern of prescribing was associated with low rates of distant recurrence. National funding models should be considered.

Citing Articles

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Geriatric Oncology-Balancing Quality of Life and Therapeutic Effectiveness Using Primary Breast Cancer as a Model.

Francis J, Baxter M, Giza D, Cheung K, Parks R Drugs Aging. 2024; 42(1):1-7.

PMID: 39671154 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-024-01167-0.


Use of a supervised machine learning model to predict Oncotype DX risk category in node-positive patients older than 50 years of age.

Williams A, Pawloski K, Wen H, Sevilimedu V, Thompson D, Morrow M Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022; 196(3):565-570.

PMID: 36269526 PMC: 10328094. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06763-5.

References
1.
Hassett M, Silver S, Hughes M, Blayney D, Edge S, Herman J . Adoption of gene expression profile testing and association with use of chemotherapy among women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30(18):2218-26. PMC: 3397718. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.5740. View

2.
Paik S, Shak S, Tang G, Kim C, Baker J, Cronin M . A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351(27):2817-26. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa041588. View

3.
Chin-Lenn L, de Boer R, Segelov E, Marx G, Hughes T, McCarthy N . The impact and indications for Oncotype DX on adjuvant treatment recommendations when third-party funding is unavailable. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2018; 14(6):410-416. DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13075. View

4.
Stemmer S, Steiner M, Rizel S, Ben-Baruch N, Uziely B, Jakubowski D . Ten-year clinical outcomes in N0 ER+ breast cancer patients with Recurrence Score-guided therapy. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2019; 5:41. PMC: 6841708. DOI: 10.1038/s41523-019-0137-3. View

5.
Sparano J, Gray R, Makower D, Pritchard K, Albain K, Hayes D . Adjuvant Chemotherapy Guided by a 21-Gene Expression Assay in Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018; 379(2):111-121. PMC: 6172658. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1804710. View