» Articles » PMID: 35711003

Common Peroneal Nerve Palsy After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Overview
Journal Int Orthop
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2022 Jun 17
PMID 35711003
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The study wants to evaluate the incidence, the clinical evolution, and treatment of common peroneal nerve (CPN) palsy after primary total hip arthroplasty.

Methods: Our clinical prospective study was made between January 2016 and December 2020. The study group comprised 1240 total hip replacements over a period of five years. Six cases were diagnosed with CPN palsy (0.48%). Five were women and one man, aged from 52 to 71 years old. The common peroneal nerve lesion was diagnosed clinically and by electromyography.

Results: The follow-up period was at least 24 months post-operatively. In all six cases, there was a complete common peroneal nerve palsy, documented by electromyography. The poorest results were obtained in the older patients and those who had the highest body mass index, which at two years post-operatively achieved only a partial sensory rehabilitation, with complete motor deficit. All patients can walk unassisted, without support, with one case having complete rehabilitation achieved 18 months postoperatively and three with partial rehabilitation.

Conclusion: CPN palsy after primary THA is a very serious complication with poor functional outcome. There is no consensus regarding the treatment. The age and the intensity of the rehabilitation program are the only significant factors for the medical rehabilitation after this debilitating post-operative complication.

Citing Articles

Effect of Treatment with Progestins and Antiplatelet Agents on IVF in Women with Adenomyosis and Recurrent Implantation Failure.

Pacu I, Zygouropoulos N, Zampieri G, Petca A, Poenaru M, Ionescu C Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(1.

PMID: 39795558 PMC: 11720576. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15010030.


Correlation and diagnostic performance of metal ions in patients with pseudotumor after MoM hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Li H, Zhang Q, Sheng N, Xie H J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):723.

PMID: 39501267 PMC: 11539633. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-05198-6.


Clinical outcomes of total hip arthroplasty after femoral neck fractures vs. osteoarthritis at one year follow up-A comparative, retrospective study.

Obada B, Georgeanu V, Iliescu M, Popescu A, Petcu L, Costea D Int Orthop. 2024; 48(9):2301-2310.

PMID: 38970678 PMC: 11347475. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-024-06242-0.


Beyond the Bony Fragment: A Review of Limbus Vertebra.

Niscoveanu C, Refi D, Obada B, Dragosloveanu S, Scheau C, Baz R Cureus. 2024; 16(5):e60065.

PMID: 38746486 PMC: 11093693. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.60065.

References
1.
Zazgyva A, Zuh S, Roman C, Gergely I, Pop T . Acetabular reconstruction with a reinforcement device and bone grafting in revision arthroplasty-a mean five years of follow-up. Int Orthop. 2015; 40(8):1631-1638. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-015-3030-1. View

2.
Zuh S, Zazgyva A, Gergely I, Pop T . Acetabuloplasty with bone grafting in uncemented hip replacement for protrusion. Int Orthop. 2015; 39(9):1757-63. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-015-2804-9. View

3.
Franz C, Rutishauser U, Rafuse V . Intrinsic neuronal properties control selective targeting of regenerating motoneurons. Brain. 2008; 131(Pt 6):1492-505. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awn039. View

4.
Tomaszewski K, Graves M, Henry B, Popieluszko P, Roy J, Pekala P . Surgical anatomy of the sciatic nerve: A meta-analysis. J Orthop Res. 2016; 34(10):1820-1827. DOI: 10.1002/jor.23186. View

5.
Isik C, Apaydin N, Acar H, Zahar A, Bozkurt M . The gluteal sling: an anatomical study. Surg Radiol Anat. 2013; 36(6):595-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00276-013-1231-0. View