Dosimetry Audits in Taiwan Radiotherapy Departments

Overview

Journal BJR Open

Publisher Oxford University Press

Specialty Radiology

Date 2022 Jun 16

PMID 35707755

Authors

An-Cheng Shiau

Shih-Ming Hsu

Pei-Yun Huang

Chiu-Ping Chen

Yi-Ting Huang

Ke-Yu Lien

Chin-Ping Chen

Shung-Hwei Fan

Shiu-Chen Jeng

Ho-Hsing Chen

Ji-An Liang

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: This study examines the practice of the regulation of Standards for Medical Exposure Quality Assurance (SMEQA) in Taiwan based on on-site quality audit for radiation therapy systems from 2016 to 2019.

Methods: 81 radiation therapy departments, 141 linacs, 9 γ knife systems, 34 high dose rate brachytherapy systems, 20 Tomotherapys, and 6 Cyberknives were audited yearly. Data collection and analysis for each institute's documents including QA procedure, ion chamber and electrometer calibration reports, and a questionnaire relating to machine type and staffing, were requested first and reviewed by auditors. On-site SMEQA core item measurements, including beam output, beam profile and energy constancy for external beam therapy systems, and the source strength, positioning, and timer accuracy for brachytherapy systems were audited second. More than 300 photon beams and more than 400 electron beams were measured each year.

Results: There were approximately 8.9 radiotherapy units per million population, and 1.2 medical physicists per unit in Taiwan. For the output measurements, more than 78 and 75% of the photon beams and electron beams, respectively, from linacs were with deviations within ±1.0%. Photon beams have lower beam quality measurement deviations than electron beams. Including in-plane and cross-plane measurements, more than 90 and 85% photon and electron beams, respectively, were with flatness consistency within 1.0%. All audit measurements were within the SMEQA acceptance criteria.

Conclusions: According to SMEQA regulations on-site QA audits were successfully carried out from 2016 to 2019 for all Taiwan radiotherapy units. The measurement results showed high quality machine performance in Taiwan.

Advances In Knowledge: Dosimetry audits with directly acquired measurement readings have lower uncertainties; allow immediate feedback, discussion, and adjustment in a timely manner. In addition to regulation system establishment and education and training implementation, the machine quality is closely related to machine maintenance implementation.

References

Healy B, Budanec M, Ourdane B, Peace T, Petrovic B, Sanz D . An IAEA survey of radiotherapy practice including quality assurance extent and depth. Acta Oncol. 2020; 59(5):503-510. DOI: 10.1080/0284186X.2020.1714721. View

Clark C, Aird E, Bolton S, Miles E, Nisbet A, Snaith J . Radiotherapy dosimetry audit: three decades of improving standards and accuracy in UK clinical practice and trials. Br J Radiol. 2015; 88(1055):20150251. PMC: 4743452. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20150251. View

KIRBY T, Hanson W, Gastorf R, Chu C, SHALEK R . Mailable TLD system for photon and electron therapy beams. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1986; 12(2):261-5. DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(86)90107-0. View

Izewska J, Bokulic T, Kazantsev P, Wesolowska P, van der Merwe D . 50 Years of the IAEA/WHO postal dose audit programme for radiotherapy: what can we learn from 13756 results?. Acta Oncol. 2020; 59(5):495-502. DOI: 10.1080/0284186X.2020.1723162. View

Langen K, Papanikolaou N, Balog J, Crilly R, Followill D, Goddu S . QA for helical tomotherapy: report of the AAPM Task Group 148. Med Phys. 2010; 37(9):4817-53. DOI: 10.1118/1.3462971. View

Almond P, Biggs P, Coursey B, Hanson W, Huq M, Nath R . AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams. Med Phys. 1999; 26(9):1847-70. DOI: 10.1118/1.598691. View

Klein E, Hanley J, Bayouth J, Yin F, Simon W, Dresser S . Task Group 142 report: quality assurance of medical accelerators. Med Phys. 2009; 36(9):4197-212. DOI: 10.1118/1.3190392. View

Dutreix A, Derreumaux S, Chavaudra J, van der Schueren E . Quality control of radiotherapy centres in Europe: beam calibration. Radiother Oncol. 1994; 32(3):256-64. DOI: 10.1016/0167-8140(94)90025-6. View

Seet K, Hanlon P, Charles P . Determination of RW3-to-water mass-energy absorption coefficient ratio for absolute dosimetry. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2011; 34(4):553-8. DOI: 10.1007/s13246-011-0102-4. View

10.

McEwen M, DeWerd L, Ibbott G, Followill D, Rogers D, Seltzer S . Addendum to the AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon beams. Med Phys. 2014; 41(4):041501. PMC: 5148035. DOI: 10.1118/1.4866223. View

11.

Tello V, Tailor R, Hanson W . How water equivalent are water-equivalent solid materials for output calibration of photon and electron beams?. Med Phys. 1995; 22(7):1177-89. DOI: 10.1118/1.597613. View

12.

Kron T, Azhari H, Voon E, Cheung K, Ravindran P, Soejoko D . Medical physics aspects of cancer care in the Asia Pacific region: 2014 survey results. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2015; 38(3):493-501. DOI: 10.1007/s13246-015-0373-2. View

13.

Ferreira I, Dutreix A, Bridier A, Chavaudra J, Svensson H . The ESTRO-QUALity assurance network (EQUAL). Radiother Oncol. 2000; 55(3):273-84. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(99)00101-2. View

14.

Izewska J, Andreo P . The IAEA/WHO TLD postal programme for radiotherapy hospitals. Radiother Oncol. 2000; 54(1):65-72. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(99)00164-4. View

15.

. A protocol for the determination of absorbed dose from high-energy photon and electron beams. Med Phys. 1983; 10(6):741-71. DOI: 10.1118/1.595446. View

16.

Kutcher G, Coia L, Gillin M, Hanson W, Leibel S, Morton R . Comprehensive QA for radiation oncology: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 40. Med Phys. 1994; 21(4):581-618. DOI: 10.1118/1.597316. View

17.

Nath R, Anderson L, Luxton G, Weaver K, Williamson J, Meigooni A . Dosimetry of interstitial brachytherapy sources: recommendations of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 43. American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Med Phys. 1995; 22(2):209-34. DOI: 10.1118/1.597458. View