» Articles » PMID: 35707484

Comparative Study on the Effectiveness of Glycopyrrolate/Formoterol Versus Tiotropium/Formoterol in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Overview
Date 2022 Jun 16
PMID 35707484
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) has several implications on health, lifestyle, and economic burden. Combinational therapy using muscarinic antagonists and beta- agonists has long been warranted for use as maintenance therapy. A lack of studies directly comparing Glycopyrrolate/Formoterol (GFF) versus Tiotropium/Formoterol (TFF) was observed which led us to analyze the effectiveness of these combinations.

Methods: In this pilot, prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-arm, 12-week period study, 60 patients with COPD (moderate-severe) were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either GFF or TFF (n = 30 each). The primary outcome was to demonstrate non-inferiority between the two groups concerning FEV for 12 weeks. The secondary outcome was the assessment of the ratio of FEV/FVC and state of health evaluation by St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ).

Results: Out of 60 participants, 58 subjects completed the study. At week 12, the mean and standard deviation value of FEV between groups were 1.49 ± 0.38 and 1.38 ± 0.30 (p > 0.05) and FEV/FVC ratio were 0.67 ± 0.09 and 0.74 ± 0.08 (p < 0.01) respectively. A significant difference was observed in the FEV and FEV/FVC values in comparison with baseline versus last follow up in both the groups (p < 0.01). However, no remarkable variation was identified in the FEV values over the two groups. The health status assessment by SGRQ showed significant improvement in both groups after the treatment.

Conclusion: Non-inferiority of GFF when compared to TFF was established along with good tolerability and comparable adverse effect profile.

Citing Articles

Comparing Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Combination Therapy With Monotherapy in Moderate-to-Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): A Narrative Review.

Prada B, Jadhav U, Ghewade B, Wagh P, Karnan A, Ledwani A Cureus. 2024; 16(4):e58633.

PMID: 38770495 PMC: 11103448. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.58633.

References
1.
Gupta D, Agarwal R, Aggarwal A, Maturu V, Dhooria S, Prasad K . Guidelines for diagnosis and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Joint ICS/NCCP (I) recommendations. Lung India. 2013; 30(3):228-67. PMC: 3775210. DOI: 10.4103/0970-2113.116248. View

2.
Chapman K, Beeh K, Beier J, Bateman E, DUrzo A, Nutbrown R . A blinded evaluation of the efficacy and safety of glycopyrronium, a once-daily long-acting muscarinic antagonist, versus tiotropium, in patients with COPD: the GLOW5 study. BMC Pulm Med. 2014; 14:4. PMC: 3907130. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2466-14-4. View

3.
Tashkin D, Celli B, Senn S, Burkhart D, Kesten S, Menjoge S . A 4-year trial of tiotropium in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359(15):1543-54. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0805800. View

4.
Wang C, Sun T, Huang Y, Humphries M, Bai L, Li L . Efficacy and safety of once-daily glycopyrronium in predominantly Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the GLOW7 study. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015; 10:57-68. PMC: 4293291. DOI: 10.2147/COPD.S72650. View

5.
Hanania N, Tashkin D, Kerwin E, Donohue J, Denenberg M, ODonnell D . Long-term safety and efficacy of glycopyrrolate/formoterol metered dose inhaler using novel Co-Suspension™ Delivery Technology in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Med. 2017; 126:105-115. DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2017.03.015. View