» Articles » PMID: 35705852

Symmetry and Spatial Ability Enhance Change Detection in Visuospatial Structures

Overview
Journal Mem Cognit
Specialty Psychology
Date 2022 Jun 15
PMID 35705852
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) domains require people to recognize and transform complex visuospatial displays that appear to vastly exceed the limits of visuospatial working memory. Here, we consider possible domain-general mechanisms that may explain this advantage: capitalizing on symmetry, a structural regularity that can produce more efficient representations. Participants briefly viewed a structure made up of three-dimensional connected cubes of different colors, which was either asymmetrical or symmetrical. After a short delay, they were asked to detect a change (colors swapping positions) within a rotated second view. In change trials, the second display always had an asymmetrical structure. The presence of symmetry in the initial view improved change detection, and performance also declined with angular disparity of the encoding and test displays. People with higher spatial ability performed better on the change-detection task, but there was no evidence that they were better at leveraging symmetry than low-spatial individuals. The results suggest that leveraging symmetrical structures can help people of all ability levels exceed typical working memory limits by constructing more efficient representations and substituting resource-demanding mental rotation operations with alternative orientation-independent strategies.

Citing Articles

Neurocognitive dynamics and behavioral differences of symmetry and asymmetry processing in working memory: insights from fNIRS.

Sztuka I, Kuhn S Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):4740.

PMID: 39922837 PMC: 11807122. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-84988-8.

References
1.
Geiser C, Lehmann W, Eid M . Separating "Rotators" From "Nonrotators" in the Mental Rotations Test: A Multigroup Latent Class Analysis. Multivariate Behav Res. 2016; 41(3):261-93. DOI: 10.1207/s15327906mbr4103_2. View

2.
Folk M, Luce R . Effects of stimulus complexity on mental rotation rate of polygons. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1987; 13(3):395-404. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.13.3.395. View

3.
Lawson R, Jolicoeur P . Recognition thresholds for plane-rotated pictures of familiar objects. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2002; 112(1):17-41. DOI: 10.1016/s0001-6918(02)00099-9. View

4.
Brady T, Tenenbaum J . A probabilistic model of visual working memory: Incorporating higher order regularities into working memory capacity estimates. Psychol Rev. 2012; 120(1):85-109. DOI: 10.1037/a0030779. View

5.
Cooper L . Mental transformations and visual comparison processes: effects of complexity and similarity. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1976; 2(4):503-14. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.2.4.503. View