» Articles » PMID: 35702584

Expanded Newborn Bloodspot Screening: Developed Country Examples and What Can Be Done in Turkey

Overview
Date 2022 Jun 15
PMID 35702584
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Bloodspot screening in newborns is an exemplary public health intervention as it is essential secondary prevention with proven efficacy and benefit for the early diagnosis and prompt treatment of rare diseases. In this mini review, newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) programs of 12 countries were examined in terms of the extent of diseases/disorders screened to form recommendations for Turkey's expanded newborn screening program. Essentially, Turkey and 11 selected countries' official policies/ national programs or strategies in terms of newborn screening and the number of diseases/conditions screened were examined. The current status of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) screening was also checked through the SMA NBS Alliance. In addition, WHO and EURORDIS guidelines for newborn screening were also reviewed. On the Pubmed database, following the search strategy "((newborn screening[Title/Abstract]) OR (newborn screening program[Title/Abstract])) OR (newborn blood spot screening[Title/Abstract])" in the PubMed database from 1 January 2008 to 1 December 2021. Diseases that will be recommended to be included in the Turkish national newborn bloodspot screening program will be presented by evaluating the updated criteria of Wilson and Jungner by constructing international comparisons. The number of diseases/disorders screened by the inspected 12 countries is eminently variable and ranges from 5 in Turkey to 51 in New York, United States of America (USA). Acknowledging the programs of other countries, it is evident that Turkey must advance its program by evaluating the epidemiological data in Turkey, the health workforce, and infrastructure while relying on the updated screening criteria. The newborn bloodspot screening program should be expanded based on the cost estimates and implemented starting with pilot applications and the diseases/disorders that are deemed appropriate should be included in the national program.

Citing Articles

Wilson and Jungner Revisited: Are Screening Criteria Fit for the 21st Century?.

Schnabel-Besson E, Mutze U, Dikow N, Horster F, Morath M, Alex K Int J Neonatal Screen. 2024; 10(3).

PMID: 39311364 PMC: 11417796. DOI: 10.3390/ijns10030062.


Current Status of Newborn Bloodspot Screening Worldwide 2024: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Activities (2020-2023).

Therrell B, Padilla C, Borrajo G, Khneisser I, Schielen P, Knight-Madden J Int J Neonatal Screen. 2024; 10(2).

PMID: 38920845 PMC: 11203842. DOI: 10.3390/ijns10020038.


An evaluation of untargeted metabolomics methods to characterize inborn errors of metabolism.

Wurth R, Turgeon C, Stander Z, Oglesbee D Mol Genet Metab. 2024; 141(1):108115.

PMID: 38181458 PMC: 10843816. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2023.108115.


Carrier screening programs for rare diseases in developed countries and the case of Turkey: A systematic review.

Fidan C, Akdur R, Unver C, Sahin O, Alper A, Ayhan A Intractable Rare Dis Res. 2023; 12(3):161-169.

PMID: 37662625 PMC: 10468408. DOI: 10.5582/irdr.2023.01005.


Identification of maternal attitudes and knowledge about newborn screenings: a Turkey sample.

Kadiroglu T, Altay G, Akay G, Can Bayrak C J Community Genet. 2023; 14(6):555-564.

PMID: 37535305 PMC: 10725403. DOI: 10.1007/s12687-023-00659-7.

References
1.
Tiwana S, Rascati K, Park H . Cost-effectiveness of expanded newborn screening in Texas. Value Health. 2012; 15(5):613-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.02.007. View

2.
Burgard P, Rupp K, Lindner M, Haege G, Rigter T, Weinreich S . Newborn screening programmes in Europe; arguments and efforts regarding harmonization. Part 2. From screening laboratory results to treatment, follow-up and quality assurance. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2012; 35(4):613-25. DOI: 10.1007/s10545-012-9484-z. View

3.
Taruscio D, Kodra Y, Ferrari G, Vittozzi L . The Italian National Rare Diseases Registry. Blood Transfus. 2014; 12 Suppl 3:s606-13. PMC: 4044798. DOI: 10.2450/2014.0064-14s. View

4.
Tezel B, Dilli D, Bolat H, Sahman H, Ozbas S, Acican D . The development and organization of newborn screening programs in Turkey. J Clin Lab Anal. 2013; 28(1):63-9. PMC: 6807568. DOI: 10.1002/jcla.21645. View

5.
Andermann A, Blancquaert I, Beauchamp S, Dery V . Revisiting Wilson and Jungner in the genomic age: a review of screening criteria over the past 40 years. Bull World Health Organ. 2008; 86(4):317-9. PMC: 2647421. DOI: 10.2471/blt.07.050112. View