» Articles » PMID: 35701156

Anti-osteoporotic Drug Utilization Rates for Secondary Prevention Among Patients with Osteoporotic Fractures

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 Jun 14
PMID 35701156
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Anti-osteoporotic drugs (AOD) are essential for secondary prevention of osteoporotic fracture (OF) in patients with established osteoporosis. However, data about AOD utilization rates are scarce among patients with OF. This study was therefore aimed at determining the AOD utilization rates among those particularly vulnerable patients.

Materials And Methods: This cross-sectional study followed the medical records of patients with OF starting from their first OF diagnosis date. Each patient's preventive osteoporosis treatments (vitamin D, calcium+vitamin D) and AOD utilization rate were recorded for a 12-month period following OF diagnosis.

Results: A total of 210 patients (168 females, mean age: 67.8±11.9 years; 42 males, mean age 62.4±16.1 years) were enrolled in the study. Of these, 65.7% (n=138) did not use any medication for primary protection against osteoporosis before OF diagnosis. The ratio of patients not using any type of medication for secondary prevention after OF increased from 26.5% to 51% during a 12-month period. In addition, by one year following diagnosis, AOD usage rate had decreased from 62.3% to 41.3%.

Conclusion: The AOD usage rates for secondary prevention of OF were insufficient, and cessation rates were high. Identification of factors associated with decreased AOD utility rates will provide important information for guiding patient follow-up in order to reduce the occurrence of OF.

Citing Articles

Effect of Lifestyle Modification Intervention Programme on Bone Mineral Density among Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis.

Anupama D, Noronha J, Acharya K, Prabhu M, Ravishankar N, Nayak B Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2023; 23(3):387-393.

PMID: 37655089 PMC: 10467558. DOI: 10.18295/squmj.1.2023.010.


Secondary Prevention of Osteoporosis: If Not Now, When?.

Dwolatzky T Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2022; 13(3).

PMID: 35921486 PMC: 9345767. DOI: 10.5041/RMMJ.10478.

References
1.
Wilk A, Sajjan S, Modi A, Fan C, Mavros P . Post-fracture pharmacotherapy for women with osteoporotic fracture: analysis of a managed care population in the USA. Osteoporos Int. 2014; 25(12):2777-86. PMC: 4221620. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-014-2827-x. View

2.
Siris E, Modi A, Tang J, Gandhi S, Sen S . Substantial under-treatment among women diagnosed with osteoporosis in a US managed-care population: a retrospective analysis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2013; 30(1):123-30. DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2013.851074. View

3.
Gillespie C, Morin P . Osteoporosis-Related Health Services Utilization Following First Hip Fracture Among a Cohort of Privately-Insured Women in the United States, 2008-2014: An Observational Study. J Bone Miner Res. 2017; 32(5):1052-1061. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3079. View

4.
Guggenbuhl P . Osteoporosis in males and females: Is there really a difference?. Joint Bone Spine. 2009; 76(6):595-601. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2009.10.001. View

5.
Eastell R, ONeill T, Hofbauer L, Langdahl B, Reid I, Gold D . Postmenopausal osteoporosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016; 2:16069. DOI: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.69. View