» Articles » PMID: 35701146

Access To, Usage and Clinic Outcomes Of, Online Postal Sexually Transmitted Infection Services: a Scoping Review

Overview
Date 2022 Jun 14
PMID 35701146
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There has been considerable expansion in online postal self-sampling (OPSS) STI services in many parts of the UK, driven by increasing demand on sexual health services and developments in diagnostics and digital health provision. This shift in service delivery has occurred against a backdrop of reduced funding and service fragmentation and the impact is unknown. We explored characteristics of people accessing and using OPSS services for STIs in the UK, the acceptability of these services and their impact on sexual health inequalities.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted of studies published in English-language based on pre-agreed inclusion/exclusion criteria, between 01 January 2010 and 07 July 2021. Nine databases were searched, and 23 studies that met the eligibility criteria were included. Studies were appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

Results: Study designs were heterogeneous, including quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods analyses. The majority were either evaluating a single-site/self-sampling provider, exploratory or observational and of variable quality. Few studies collected comprehensive user demographic data. Individuals accessing OPSS tended to be asymptomatic, of white ethnicity, women, over 20 years and from less deprived areas. OPSS tended to increase overall STI testing demand and access, although return rates for blood samples were low, as was test positivity. There were varied results on whether services reduced time to treatment. OPSS services were acceptable to the majority of users. Qualitative studies showed the importance of trust, confidentiality, discretion, reliability, convenience and improved patient choice.

Conclusion: OPSS services appear highly acceptable to users. However, uptake appears to be socially patterned and some groups who bear a disproportionate burden of poor sexual health in the UK are under-represented among users. Current provision of online self-sampling could widen health inequalities, particularly where other options for testing are limited. Work is needed to fully evaluate the impact and cost-effectiveness of OPSS services.

Citing Articles

A Perspective on Home-Based Sexual Health Care: Evidence, Access, and Future Directions.

Hanneke Goense C, Evers Y, Hoebe C, Dukers-Muijrers N Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2025; 22(1):20.

PMID: 40000537 PMC: 11861391. DOI: 10.1007/s11904-025-00724-5.


Opening the digital doorway to sexual healthcare: Recommendations from a behaviour change wheel analysis of barriers and facilitators to seeking online sexual health information and support among underserved populations.

McLeod J, Estcourt C, MacDonald J, Gibbs J, Woode Owusu M, Mapp F PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0315049.

PMID: 39775372 PMC: 11709294. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315049.


An evaluation of an online STI service across London: reviewing uptake, utility and outcomes over a 4-year period.

Tittle V, Day S, Tostevin A, Kelly A, Spate J, Burns F Sex Transm Infect. 2024; 101(1):41-48.

PMID: 39358008 PMC: 11877036. DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2024-056232.


Who accessed STI testing in Britain during the COVID-19 pandemic and how: Findings from Natsal-COVID, a cross-sectional quasi-representative survey.

Marquez N, Howarth A, Dema E, Burns F, Copas A, Mercer C Int J STD AIDS. 2024; 35(13):1055-1071.

PMID: 39259923 PMC: 11481401. DOI: 10.1177/09564624241277582.


Missed opportunities to provide sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections testing in British Columbia: An interpretive description of users' experiences of Get Checked Online's design and implementation.

Iyamu I, Kassam R, Worthington C, Grace D, Pedersen H, Haag D Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241277653.

PMID: 39233893 PMC: 11372858. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241277653.


References
1.
Estcourt C, Gibbs J, Sutcliffe L, Gkatzidou V, Tickle L, Hone K . The eSexual Health Clinic system for management, prevention, and control of sexually transmitted infections: exploratory studies in people testing for Chlamydia trachomatis. Lancet Public Health. 2017; 2(4):e182-e190. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30034-8. View

2.
Syred J, Holdsworth G, Howroyd C, Spelman K, Baraitser P . Choose to test: self-selected testing for sexually transmitted infections within an online service. Sex Transm Infect. 2019; 95(3):171-174. PMC: 6580742. DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2018-053796. View

3.
Banerjee P, Madhwapathi V, Thorley N, Radcliffe K . A service evaluation comparing home-based testing to clinic-based testing for HIV, syphilis and hepatitis B in Birmingham and Solihull. Int J STD AIDS. 2020; 31(7):613-618. DOI: 10.1177/0956462419900461. View

4.
Ayiku L, Levay P, Hudson T, Craven J, Finnegan A, Adams R . The Embase UK filter: validation of a geographic search filter to retrieve research about the UK from OVID Embase. Health Info Libr J. 2019; 36(2):121-133. DOI: 10.1111/hir.12252. View

5.
Day S, Smith J, Perera S, Jones S, Kinsella R . Beyond the binary: sexual health outcomes of transgender and non-binary service users of an online sexual health service. Int J STD AIDS. 2021; 32(10):896-902. DOI: 10.1177/0956462420982830. View