Uptake Mechanisms of a Novel, Activated Carbon-Based Equilibrium Passive Sampler for Estimating Porewater Methylmercury

Overview

Journal Environ Toxicol Chem

Publisher Oxford University Press

Date 2022 Jun 14

PMID 35698924

Authors

Spencer J Washburn

Jada Damond

James P Sanders

Cynthia C Gilmour

Upal Ghosh

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

We describe the validation of a novel polymeric equilibrium passive sampler comprised of agarose gel with embedded activated carbon particles (ag+AC), to estimate aqueous monomethylmercury (MeHg) concentrations. Sampler behavior was tested using a combination of idealized media and realistic sediment microcosms. Isotherm bottle experiments with ag+AC polymers were conducted to constrain partitioning to these materials by various environmentally relevant species of MeHg bound to dissolved organic matter (MeHgDOM) across a range of sizes and character. Log of partitioning coefficients for passive samplers (K ) ranged from 1.98 ± 0.09 for MeHg bound to Suwannee River humic acid to 3.15 ± 0.05 for MeHg complexed with Upper Mississippi River natural organic matter. Reversible equilibrium exchange of environmentally relevant MeHg species was demonstrated through a series of dual isotope-labeled exchange experiments. Isotopically labeled MeHgDOM species approached equilibrium in the samplers over 14 days, while mass balance was maintained, providing strong evidence that the ag+AC polymer material is capable of equilibrium measurements of environmentally relevant MeHg species within a reasonable deployment time frame. Samplers deployed across the sediment-water interface of sediment microcosms estimated both overlying water and porewater MeHg concentrations within a factor of 2 to 4 of measured values, based on the average measured K values for species of MeHg bound to natural organic matter in the isotherm experiments. Taken together, our results indicate that ag+AC polymers, used as equilibrium samplers, can provide accurate MeHg estimations across many site chemistries, with a simple back-calculation based on a standardized K Environ Toxicol Chem 2022;41:2052-2064. © 2022 SETAC.

References

Gomez-Eyles J, Yupanqui C, Beckingham B, Riedel G, Gilmour C, Ghosh U . Evaluation of biochars and activated carbons for in situ remediation of sediments impacted with organics, mercury, and methylmercury. Environ Sci Technol. 2013; 47(23):13721-9. DOI: 10.1021/es403712q. View

Gibert O, Lefevre B, Fernandez M, Bernat X, Paraira M, Pons M . Fractionation and removal of dissolved organic carbon in a full-scale granular activated carbon filter used for drinking water production. Water Res. 2013; 47(8):2821-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.02.028. View

Liu P, Ptacek C, Blowes D, Landis R . Mechanisms of mercury removal by biochars produced from different feedstocks determined using X-ray absorption spectroscopy. J Hazard Mater. 2016; 308:233-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.01.007. View

Schreiber B, Schmalz V, Brinkmann T, Worch E . The effect of water temperature on the adsorption equilibrium of dissolved organic matter and atrazine on granular activated carbon. Environ Sci Technol. 2007; 41(18):6448-53. DOI: 10.1021/es070704+. View

Schreiber B, Brinkmann T, Schmalz V, Worch E . Adsorption of dissolved organic matter onto activated carbon--the influence of temperature, absorption wavelength, and molecular size. Water Res. 2005; 39(15):3449-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.05.050. View

Ting Y, Chen C, Chng B, Wang Y, Hsi H . Using raw and sulfur-impregnated activated carbon as active cap for leaching inhibition of mercury and methylmercury from contaminated sediment. J Hazard Mater. 2018; 354:116-124. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.04.074. View

Shimizu Y, Ateia M, Yoshimura C . Natural organic matter undergoes different molecular sieving by adsorption on activated carbon and carbon nanotubes. Chemosphere. 2018; 203:345-352. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.03.197. View

Wang L, Hou D, Cao Y, Ok Y, Tack F, Rinklebe J . Remediation of mercury contaminated soil, water, and air: A review of emerging materials and innovative technologies. Environ Int. 2019; 134:105281. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105281. View

Haitzer M, Aiken G, Ryan J . Binding of mercury(II) to dissolved organic matter: the role of the mercury-to-DOM concentration ratio. Environ Sci Technol. 2002; 36(16):3564-70. DOI: 10.1021/es025699i. View

10.

Schwartz G, Sanders J, McBurney A, Brown S, Ghosh U, Gilmour C . Impact of dissolved organic matter on mercury and methylmercury sorption to activated carbon in soils: implications for remediation. Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2019; 21(3):485-496. DOI: 10.1039/c8em00469b. View

11.

Zhang C, Zhu M, Zeng G, Yu Z, Cui F, Yang Z . Active capping technology: a new environmental remediation of contaminated sediment. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016; 23(5):4370-86. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-6076-8. View

12.

Kanzler C, Lian P, Trainer E, Yang X, Govind N, Parks J . Emerging investigator series: methylmercury speciation and dimethylmercury production in sulfidic solutions. Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2018; 20(4):584-594. DOI: 10.1039/c7em00533d. View

13.

Shimabuku K, Cho H, Townsend E, Rosario-Ortiz F, Summers R . Modeling nonequilibrium adsorption of MIB and sulfamethoxazole by powdered activated carbon and the role of dissolved organic matter competition. Environ Sci Technol. 2014; 48(23):13735-42. DOI: 10.1021/es503512v. View

14.

Mayer P, Parkerton T, Adams R, Cargill J, Gan J, Gouin T . Passive sampling methods for contaminated sediments: scientific rationale supporting use of freely dissolved concentrations. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2013; 10(2):197-209. PMC: 4235458. DOI: 10.1002/ieam.1508. View

15.

Taylor V, Buckman K, Burgess R . Preliminary investigation of polymer-based in situ passive samplers for mercury and methylmercury. Chemosphere. 2019; 234:806-814. PMC: 6742538. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.06.093. View

16.

Clarisse O, Foucher D, Hintelmann H . Methylmercury speciation in the dissolved phase of a stratified lake using the diffusive gradient in thin film technique. Environ Pollut. 2008; 157(3):987-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2008.10.012. View

17.

Clarisse O, Hintelmann H . Measurements of dissolved methylmercury in natural waters using diffusive gradients in thin film (DGT). J Environ Monit. 2006; 8(12):1242-7. DOI: 10.1039/b614560d. View

18.

Gilmour C, Riedel G, Riedel G, Kwon S, Landis R, Brown S . Activated carbon mitigates mercury and methylmercury bioavailability in contaminated sediments. Environ Sci Technol. 2013; 47(22):13001-10. DOI: 10.1021/es4021074. View

19.

Sanders J, Andrade N, Ghosh U . Evaluation of passive sampling polymers and nonequilibrium adjustment methods in a multiyear surveillance of sediment porewater PCBs. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2018; 37(9):2487-2495. DOI: 10.1002/etc.4223. View

20.

Khwaja A, Bloom P, Brezonik P . Binding strength of methylmercury to aquatic NOM. Environ Sci Technol. 2010; 44(16):6151-6. DOI: 10.1021/es101088k. View