» Articles » PMID: 35697947

Understanding Fascial Anatomy and Interfascial Communication: Implications in Regional Anesthesia

Overview
Journal J Anesth
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 2022 Jun 13
PMID 35697947
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

With the extensive application of ultrasound in regional anesthesia, there has been rapid development of interfascial plane block techniques recently. Compared with neuraxial anesthesia or nerve plexus blocks, the interfascial plane blocks have many advantages, such as technical simplicity, fewer complications and comparable or better analgesia. The concept of fascial interconnectivity is fundamental in understanding the effects and complications of interfascial plane blocks. Many fascial planes are continuous and communicate with each other without a clear anatomical boundary. The prevertebral fascia of the neck, endothoracic fascia of the chest, transversalis fascia of the abdomen, and the fascia iliaca of the pelvic cavity form a natural fascial continuation. This anatomical feature suggests that the space beneath the cervical prevertebral fascia, the thoracic paravertebral space, the space between transversalis fascia and psoas muscles (psoas major and quadratus lumborum), and the fascia iliaca compartment are a confluent potential cavity. Additionally, the permeability of the fascia at different anatomical locations to local anesthetics is different, which can also influence the block effect and the incidence of complications. This article summarizes the anatomical characteristics and communication relationships of the major fascia which are related to regional anesthesia, and their relationships with block effects and complications.

Citing Articles

Evaluating Anesthesia Guidance for Rescue Analgesia in Awake Patients Undergoing Carotid Endarterectomy with Cervical Plexus Blocks: Preliminary Findings from a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Stasiowski M, Zmarzly N, Grabarek B J Clin Med. 2025; 14(1.

PMID: 39797203 PMC: 11722067. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14010120.


Retrospective evaluation of postoperative analgesia efficacy of a new technique in anterior iliac crest bone graft harvesting: anterior iliac block.

Yorukoglu H, Cesur S, Izgin Avci I, GoK A, Aksu C, Selek O BMC Anesthesiol. 2024; 24(1):443.

PMID: 39609729 PMC: 11605857. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-024-02829-7.


Comparison of combined deep and superficial serratus anterior block with thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative pain in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

Ulger G, Zengin M, Kucuk O, Baldemir R, Kaybal O, Tunc M Turk J Med Sci. 2024; 54(5):1021-1032.

PMID: 39473759 PMC: 11518326. DOI: 10.55730/1300-0144.5881.


Fascia as a regulatory system in health and disease.

Slater A, Barclay S, Granfar R, Pratt R Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1458385.

PMID: 39188704 PMC: 11346343. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1458385.


A comparison of different volumes of bupivacaine used in fascia iliaca compartment block.

Gul R, Kilinc M, Sahin L Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2023; 29(3):337-343.

PMID: 36880630 PMC: 10225824. DOI: 10.14744/tjtes.2023.51268.


References
1.
Stecco C, Tiengo C, Stecco A, Porzionato A, Macchi V, Stern R . Fascia redefined: anatomical features and technical relevance in fascial flap surgery. Surg Radiol Anat. 2012; 35(5):369-76. DOI: 10.1007/s00276-012-1058-0. View

2.
Adstrum S, Hedley G, Schleip R, Stecco C, Yucesoy C . Defining the fascial system. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2017; 21(1):173-177. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2016.11.003. View

3.
Elsharkawy H, Pawa A, Mariano E . Interfascial Plane Blocks: Back to Basics. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018; 43(4):341-346. DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000750. View

4.
Stecco A, Macchi V, Masiero S, Porzionato A, Tiengo C, Stecco C . Pectoral and femoral fasciae: common aspects and regional specializations. Surg Radiol Anat. 2008; 31(1):35-42. DOI: 10.1007/s00276-008-0395-5. View

5.
Willard F, Vleeming A, Schuenke M, Danneels L, Schleip R . The thoracolumbar fascia: anatomy, function and clinical considerations. J Anat. 2012; 221(6):507-36. PMC: 3512278. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2012.01511.x. View