» Articles » PMID: 35692900

Influence of Indoor Airflow on Particle Spread of a Single Breath and Cough in Enclosures: Does Opening a Window Really 'help'?

Overview
Date 2022 Jun 13
PMID 35692900
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The spread of respiratory diseases via aerosol particles in indoor settings is of significant concern. The SARS-CoV-2 virus has been found to spread widely in confined enclosures like hotels, hospitals, cruise ships, prisons, and churches. Particles exhaled from a person indoors can remain suspended long enough for increasing the opportunity for particles to spread spatially. Careful consideration of the ventilation system is essential to minimise the spread of particles containing infectious pathogens. Previous studies have shown that indoor airflow induced by opened windows would minimise the spread of particles. However, how outdoor airflow through an open window influences the indoor airflow has not been considered. The aim of this study is to provide a clear understanding of the indoor particle spread across multiple rooms, in a situation similar to what is found in quarantine hotels and cruise ships, using a combination of HVAC (Heating, Ventilation and Air-Conditioning) ventilation and an opening window. Using a previously validated mathematical model, we used 3D CFD (computational fluid dynamics) simulations to investigate to what extent different indoor airflow scenarios contribute to the transport of a single injection of particles ( ) in a basic 3D multi-room indoor environment. Although this study is limited to short times, we demonstrate that in certain conditions approximately 80% of the particles move from one room to the corridor and over 60% move to the nearby room within 5 to 15 s. Our results provide additional information to help identifying relevant recommendations to limit particles from spreading in enclosures.

Citing Articles

Creating respiratory pathogen-free environments in healthcare and nursing-care settings: a comprehensive review.

Nagy A, Czitrovszky A, Lehoczki A, Farkas A, Furi P, Osan J Geroscience. 2024; 47(1):543-571.

PMID: 39392557 PMC: 11872867. DOI: 10.1007/s11357-024-01379-7.


Reduction of acute respiratory infections in day-care by non-pharmaceutical interventions: a narrative review.

Andrup L, Krogfelt K, Stephansen L, Hansen K, Graversen B, Wolkoff P Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1332078.

PMID: 38420031 PMC: 10899481. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1332078.


Experimental study on the control effects of different strategies on particle transportation in a conference room: Mechanical ventilation, baffle, portable air cleaner, and desk air cleaner.

Mao Y, Xie H, Liang J, He J, Ren J Atmos Pollut Res. 2023; 14(4):101716.

PMID: 36942301 PMC: 9996463. DOI: 10.1016/j.apr.2023.101716.

References
1.
Cortellessa G, Stabile L, Arpino F, Faleiros D, van den Bos W, Morawska L . Close proximity risk assessment for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Sci Total Environ. 2021; 794:148749. PMC: 8242194. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148749. View

2.
Chao C, Wan M, Morawska L, Johnson G, Ristovski Z, Hargreaves M . Characterization of expiration air jets and droplet size distributions immediately at the mouth opening. J Aerosol Sci. 2020; 40(2):122-133. PMC: 7126899. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2008.10.003. View

3.
Nicas M, Nazaroff W, Hubbard A . Toward understanding the risk of secondary airborne infection: emission of respirable pathogens. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2005; 2(3):143-54. PMC: 7196697. DOI: 10.1080/15459620590918466. View

4.
Yu O, Sheppard L, Lumley T, Koenig J, Shapiro G . Effects of ambient air pollution on symptoms of asthma in Seattle-area children enrolled in the CAMP study. Environ Health Perspect. 2001; 108(12):1209-14. PMC: 1240204. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.001081209. View

5.
Rocklov J, Sjodin H, Wilder-Smith A . COVID-19 outbreak on the Diamond Princess cruise ship: estimating the epidemic potential and effectiveness of public health countermeasures. J Travel Med. 2020; 27(3). PMC: 7107563. DOI: 10.1093/jtm/taaa030. View