» Articles » PMID: 35690630

Quantitative Digital Histopathology and Machine Learning to Predict Pathological Complete Response to Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients Using Pre-treatment Tumor Biopsies

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2022 Jun 11
PMID 35690630
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Complete pathological response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a prognostic factor for breast cancer (BC) patients and is correlated with improved survival. However, pCR rates are variable to standard NAC, depending on BC subtype. This study investigates quantitative digital histopathology coupled with machine learning (ML) to predict NAC response a priori. Clinicopathologic data and digitized slides of BC core needle biopsies were collected from 149 patients treated with NAC. The nuclei within the tumor regions were segmented on the histology images of biopsy samples using a weighted U-Net model. Five pathomic feature subsets were extracted from segmented digitized samples, including the morphological, intensity-based, texture, graph-based and wavelet features. Seven ML experiments were conducted with different feature sets to develop a prediction model of therapy response using a gradient boosting machine with decision trees. The models were trained and optimized using a five-fold cross validation on the training data and evaluated using an unseen independent test set. The prediction model developed with the best clinical features (tumor size, tumor grade, age, and ER, PR, HER2 status) demonstrated an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.73. Various pathomic feature subsets resulted in models with AUCs in the range of 0.67 and 0.87, with the best results associated with the graph-based and wavelet features. The selected features among all subsets of the pathomic and clinicopathologic features included four wavelet and three graph-based features and no clinical features. The predictive model developed with these features outperformed the other models, with an AUC of 0.90, a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 82% on the independent test set. The results demonstrated the potential of quantitative digital histopathology features integrated with ML methods in predicting BC response to NAC. This study is a step forward towards precision oncology for BC patients to potentially guide future therapies.

Citing Articles

Machine Learning-Based Pathomics Model to Predict the Prognosis in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Li X, Yang X, Yang X, Xie X, Rui W, He H Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2024; 23:15330338241307686.

PMID: 39703069 PMC: 11662324. DOI: 10.1177/15330338241307686.


Predicting prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma by predicting TIGIT expression: a pathomics model.

Hu P, Tian B, Gu H, Liu H, Li Q J Thorac Dis. 2024; 16(11):7617-7629.

PMID: 39678866 PMC: 11635229. DOI: 10.21037/jtd-24-978.


NETosis Genes and Pathomic Signature: A Novel Prognostic Marker for Ovarian Serous Cystadenocarcinoma.

Zhan F, Guo Y, He L J Imaging Inform Med. 2024; .

PMID: 39663319 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-024-01366-6.


Relationship between EZH2 expression and prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma using a pathomics predictive model.

Zhou X, Man M, Cui M, Zhou X, Hu Y, Liu Q Heliyon. 2024; 10(20):e38562.

PMID: 39640777 PMC: 11619983. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38562.


Pathomic and bioinformatics analysis of clinical-pathological and genomic factors for pancreatic cancer prognosis.

Li Y, Pan L, Mugaanyi J, Li H, Li G, Huang J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):27769.

PMID: 39533091 PMC: 11557977. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-79619-1.


References
1.
Sannachi L, Gangeh M, Tadayyon H, Gandhi S, Wright F, Slodkowska E . Breast Cancer Treatment Response Monitoring Using Quantitative Ultrasound and Texture Analysis: Comparative Analysis of Analytical Models. Transl Oncol. 2019; 12(10):1271-1281. PMC: 6639683. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2019.06.004. View

2.
Moghadas-Dastjerdi H, Sha-E-Tallat H, Sannachi L, Sadeghi-Naini A, Czarnota G . A priori prediction of tumour response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients using quantitative CT and machine learning. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):10936. PMC: 7331583. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-67823-8. View

3.
Pfob A, Sidey-Gibbons C, Lee H, Tasoulis M, Koelbel V, Golatta M . Identification of breast cancer patients with pathologic complete response in the breast after neoadjuvant systemic treatment by an intelligent vacuum-assisted biopsy. Eur J Cancer. 2020; 143:134-146. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.11.006. View

4.
Sousa C, Cruz M, Neto A, Pereira K, Peixoto M, Bastos J . Neoadjuvant radiotherapy in the approach of locally advanced breast cancer. ESMO Open. 2020; 4(Suppl 2). PMC: 7082639. DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2019-000640. View

5.
Kolios C, Sannachi L, Dasgupta A, Suraweera H, DiCenzo D, Stanisz G . MRI texture features from tumor core and margin in the prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Oncotarget. 2021; 12(14):1354-1365. PMC: 8274727. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.28002. View