Global Distributions, Source-type Dependencies, and Concentration Ranges of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Groundwater

Overview

Journal Sci Total Environ

Date 2022 Jun 11

PMID 35690215

Authors

Gwynn R Johnson

Mark L Brusseau

Kenneth C Carroll

Geoffrey R Tick

Candice M Duncan

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

A meta-analysis was conducted of published literature reporting concentrations of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in groundwater for sites distributed in 20 countries across the globe. Data for >35 PFAS were aggregated from 96 reports published from 1999 to 2021. The final data set comprises approximately 21,000 data points after removal of time-series and duplicate samples as well as non-detects. The reported concentrations range over many orders of magnitude, from ng/L to mg/L levels. Distinct differences in concentration ranges are observed between sites located within or near sources versus those that are not. Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), ranging from <0.03 ng/L to ~7 mg/L, and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), ranging from 0.01 ng/L to ~5 mg/L, were the two most reported PFAS. The highest PFAS concentration in groundwater is ~15 mg/L reported for the replacement-PFAS 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonate (6:2 FTS). Maximum reported groundwater concentrations for PFOA and PFOS were compared to concentrations reported for soils, surface waters, marine waters, and precipitation. Soil concentrations are generally significantly higher than those reported for the other media. This accrues to soil being the primary entry point for PFAS release into the environment for many sites, as well as the generally significantly greater retention capacity of soil compared to the other media. The presence of PFAS has been reported for all media in all regions tested, including areas that are far removed from specific PFAS sources. This gives rise to the existence of a "background" concentration of PFAS that must be accounted for in both regional and site-specific risk assessments. The presence of this background is a reflection of the large-scale use of PFAS, their general recalcitrance, and the action of long-range transport processes that distribute PFAS across regional and global scales. This ubiquitous distribution has the potential to significantly impact the quality and availability of water resources in many regions. In addition, the pervasive presence of PFAS in the environment engenders concerns for impacts to ecosystem and human health.

Citing Articles

Sources and Pathways of PFAS Occurrence in Water Sources: Relative Contribution of Land-Applied Biosolids in an Agricultural Dominated Watershed.

Peter L, Lee L Environ Sci Technol. 2025; 59(2):1344-1353.

PMID: 39779456 PMC: 11874022. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.4c09490.

The accurate determination of Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) removal efficiency by integrated-sonochemical system.

Panda D, Cochennec M, Colombano S, Laulier B, Tierce P, Baudouard A Ultrason Sonochem. 2025; 113:107222.

PMID: 39778400 PMC: 11763605. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2025.107222.

Pyrolysis of Two Perfluoroalkanesulfonates (PFSAs) and PFSA-Laden Granular Activated Carbon (GAC): Decomposition Mechanisms and the Role of GAC.

Wang J, Chen K, Jin B, Woo W, Lum M, Canchola A Environ Sci Technol. 2024; 58(49):21850-21860.

PMID: 39592003 PMC: 11636236. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.4c06805.

[Determination of 13 perfluorinated and polyfluoroalkyl substances in fishes by QuEChERS-ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry].

Liu X, Liu Z, Wang M, Gu C, Wang X, Liu L Se Pu. 2024; 42(8):740-748.

PMID: 39086242 PMC: 11292479. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2023.08002.

Quantifying the Hydrophobic Effect per CF Moiety from Adsorption of Fluorinated Alcohols at the Water/Oil Interface.

Peychev B, Arabadzhieva D, Minkov I, Mileva E, Slavchov R Molecules. 2024; 29(7).

PMID: 38611701 PMC: 11154390. DOI: 10.3390/molecules29071421.

References

Backe W, Day T, Field J . Zwitterionic, cationic, and anionic fluorinated chemicals in aqueous film forming foam formulations and groundwater from U.S. military bases by nonaqueous large-volume injection HPLC-MS/MS. Environ Sci Technol. 2013; 47(10):5226-34. DOI: 10.1021/es3034999. View

Castiglioni S, Valsecchi S, Polesello S, Rusconi M, Melis M, Palmiotto M . Sources and fate of perfluorinated compounds in the aqueous environment and in drinking water of a highly urbanized and industrialized area in Italy. J Hazard Mater. 2014; 282:51-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.06.007. View

Lindstrom A, Strynar M, Delinsky A, Nakayama S, McMillan L, Libelo E . Application of WWTP biosolids and resulting perfluorinated compound contamination of surface and well water in Decatur, Alabama, USA. Environ Sci Technol. 2011; 45(19):8015-21. DOI: 10.1021/es1039425. View

Pepper I, Brusseau M, Prevatt F, Escobar B . Incidence of Pfas in soil following long-term application of class B biosolids. Sci Total Environ. 2021; 793:148449. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148449. View

Wilhelm M, Bergmann S, Dieter H . Occurrence of perfluorinated compounds (PFCs) in drinking water of North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany and new approach to assess drinking water contamination by shorter-chained C4-C7 PFCs. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2010; 213(3):224-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2010.05.004. View

Gao Q, Blum K, Gago-Ferrero P, Wiberg K, Ahrens L, Andersson P . Impact of on-site wastewater infiltration systems on organic contaminants in groundwater and recipient waters. Sci Total Environ. 2018; 651(Pt 2):1670-1679. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.016. View

Petre M, Genereux D, Koropeckyj-Cox L, Knappe D, Duboscq S, Gilmore T . Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substance (PFAS) Transport from Groundwater to Streams near a PFAS Manufacturing Facility in North Carolina, USA. Environ Sci Technol. 2021; 55(9):5848-5856. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c07978. View

Harrad S, Drage D, Sharkey M, Berresheim H . Perfluoroalkyl substances and brominated flame retardants in landfill-related air, soil, and groundwater from Ireland. Sci Total Environ. 2020; 705:135834. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135834. View

Boiteux V, Dauchy X, Rosin C, Munoz J . National screening study on 10 perfluorinated compounds in raw and treated tap water in France. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2012; 63(1):1-12. DOI: 10.1007/s00244-012-9754-7. View

10.

Boone J, Guan B, Vigo C, Boone T, Byrne C, Ferrario J . A method for the analysis of perfluorinated compounds in environmental and drinking waters and the determination of their lowest concentration minimal reporting levels. J Chromatogr A. 2014; 1345:68-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2014.04.001. View

11.

Dauchy X, Boiteux V, Bach C, Rosin C, Munoz J . Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in firefighting foam concentrates and water samples collected near sites impacted by the use of these foams. Chemosphere. 2017; 183:53-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.05.056. View

12.

Heydebreck F, Tang J, Xie Z, Ebinghaus R . Alternative and Legacy Perfluoroalkyl Substances: Differences between European and Chinese River/Estuary Systems. Environ Sci Technol. 2015; 49(14):8386-95. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b01648. View

13.

Kuroda K, Murakami M, Oguma K, Takada H, Takizawa S . Investigating sources and pathways of perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs) in aquifers in Tokyo using multiple tracers. Sci Total Environ. 2014; 488-489:51-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.04.066. View

14.

Cao X, Wang C, Lu Y, Zhang M, Khan K, Song S . Occurrence, sources and health risk of polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in soil, water and sediment from a drinking water source area. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2019; 174:208-217. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.02.058. View

15.

McGuire M, Schaefer C, Richards T, Backe W, Field J, Houtz E . Evidence of remediation-induced alteration of subsurface poly- and perfluoroalkyl substance distribution at a former firefighter training area. Environ Sci Technol. 2014; 48(12):6644-52. DOI: 10.1021/es5006187. View

16.

Yao Y, Zhu H, Li B, Hu H, Zhang T, Yamazaki E . Distribution and primary source analysis of per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances with different chain lengths in surface and groundwater in two cities, North China. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2014; 108:318-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.07.021. View

17.

Bjornsdotter M, Yeung L, Karrman A, Ericson Jogsten I . Ultra-Short-Chain Perfluoroalkyl Acids Including Trifluoromethane Sulfonic Acid in Water Connected to Known and Suspected Point Sources in Sweden. Environ Sci Technol. 2019; 53(19):11093-11101. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b02211. View

18.

Wei C, Wang Q, Song X, Chen X, Fan R, Ding D . Distribution, source identification and health risk assessment of PFASs and two PFOS alternatives in groundwater from non-industrial areas. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2018; 152:141-150. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.01.039. View

19.

Banzhaf S, Filipovic M, Lewis J, Sparrenbom C, Barthel R . A review of contamination of surface-, ground-, and drinking water in Sweden by perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs). Ambio. 2016; 46(3):335-346. PMC: 5347527. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-016-0848-8. View

20.

Quinones O, Snyder S . Occurrence of perfluoroalkyl carboxylates and sulfonates in drinking water utilities and related waters from the United States. Environ Sci Technol. 2009; 43(24):9089-95. DOI: 10.1021/es9024707. View