» Articles » PMID: 35684760

Static Balance Digital Endpoints with Mon4t: Smartphone Sensors Vs. Force Plate

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2022 Jun 10
PMID 35684760
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Static balance tests are conducted in various clinics for diagnosis and treatment adjustment. As a result of population aging, the accessibility of these tests should be increased, in the clinic, and for remote patient examination. A number of publications have already conducted static balance evaluations using the sensors embedded in a smartphone. This study focuses on the applicability of using smartphone-based balance assessment on a large scale while considering ease of use, safety, and reliability. The Mon4t app was used to acquire the postural motion using different smartphone devices, different smartphone locations, and various standing postures. The signals derived from the app were compared to the center of pressure displacement derived from a force plate. The results showed moderate to high agreement between the two methods, particularly at the tandem stance (0.69 ≤ ≤ 0.91). Preliminary data collection was conducted on three healthy participants, followed by 50 additional healthy volunteers, aged 65+. The results demonstrated that the Mon4t app can serve as an accessible and inexpensive static balance assessment tool, both in clinical settings and for remote patient monitoring, which is key for enabling telehealth.

Citing Articles

Sensor-Based Gait and Balance Assessment in Healthy Adults: Analysis of Short-Term Training and Sensor Placement Effects.

Rentz C, Kaiser V, Jung N, Turlach B, Sahandi Far M, Peterburs J Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(17).

PMID: 39275509 PMC: 11397791. DOI: 10.3390/s24175598.


Exercise therapy as a digital therapeutic for chronic disease management: consideration for clinical product development.

Grannell A, Hallson H, Gunlaugsson B, Jonsson H Front Digit Health. 2024; 5:1250979.

PMID: 38173910 PMC: 10761443. DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1250979.


Smartphone-based evaluation of static balance and mobility in long-lasting COVID-19 patients.

Correa B, Santos E, Belgamo A, Pinto G, Xavier S, Silva C Front Neurol. 2023; 14:1277408.

PMID: 38148981 PMC: 10750373. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1277408.


Circadian profile, daytime activity, and the Parkinson's phenotype: A motion sensor pilot study with neurobiological underpinnings.

Marano M, Rosati J, Magliozzi A, Casamassa A, Rappa A, Sergi G Neurobiol Sleep Circadian Rhythms. 2023; 14:100094.

PMID: 37025301 PMC: 10070882. DOI: 10.1016/j.nbscr.2023.100094.

References
1.
Greene B, McGrath D, Walsh L, Doheny E, McKeown D, Garattini C . Quantitative falls risk estimation through multi-sensor assessment of standing balance. Physiol Meas. 2012; 33(12):2049-63. DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/33/12/2049. View

2.
Park D, Lee G . Validity and reliability of balance assessment software using the Nintendo Wii balance board: usability and validation. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014; 11:99. PMC: 4074461. DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-99. View

3.
Yahalom H, Israeli-Korn S, Linder M, Yekutieli Z, Karlinsky K, Rubel Y . Psychiatric Patients on Neuroleptics: Evaluation of Parkinsonism and Quantified Assessment of Gait. Clin Neuropharmacol. 2019; 43(1):1-6. DOI: 10.1097/WNF.0000000000000371. View

4.
Mancini M, Horak F . The relevance of clinical balance assessment tools to differentiate balance deficits. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2010; 46(2):239-48. PMC: 3033730. View

5.
Mayagoitia R, Lotters J, Veltink P, Hermens H . Standing balance evaluation using a triaxial accelerometer. Gait Posture. 2002; 16(1):55-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0966-6362(01)00199-0. View