» Articles » PMID: 35683439

Environmental Enrichment Components Required to Reduce Methamphetamine-Induced Behavioral Sensitization in Mice: Examination of Behaviors and Neural Substrates

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2022 Jun 10
PMID 35683439
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Environmental enrichment (EE) involves the presentation of various sensory, physical, social, and cognitive stimuli in order to alter neural activity in specific brain areas, which can ameliorate methamphetamine (MAMPH)-induced behavioral sensitization and comorbid anxiety symptoms. No previous studies have comprehensively examined which EE components are critical for effectively reducing MAMPH-induced behavioral sensitization and anxiety. This study examined different housing conditions, including standard housing (SH, No EE), standard EE (STEE), physical EE (PEE), cognitive EE (CEE), and social EE (SEE). In the beginning, mice were randomly assigned to the different combinations of housing conditions and injections, consisting of No EE/Saline, No EE/MAMPH, STEE/MAMPH, PEE/MAMPH, CEE/MAMPH, and SEE/MAMPH groups. Then, the mice received intraperitoneal injections of 1 mg/kg MAMPH or normal saline daily for 7 days, followed by a final injection of 0.5 mg/kg MAMPH or normal saline. After behavioral tests, all mice were examined for c-Fos immunohistochemical staining. The results showed that MAMPH induced behavioral sensitization as measured by distance traveled. MAMPH appeared to induce lowered anxiety responses and severe hyperactivity. All EE conditions did not affect MAMPH-induced lowered anxiety behaviors. STEE was likely more effective for reducing MAMPH-induced behavioral sensitization than PEE, CEE, and SEE. The c-Fos expression analysis showed that the medial prefrontal cortex (i.e., cingulate cortex 1 (Cg1), prelimbic cortex (PrL), and infralimbic cortex (IL)), nucleus accumbens (NAc), basolateral amygdala (BLA), ventral tegmental area (VTA), caudate-putamen (CPu), and hippocampus (i.e., CA1, CA3, and dentate gyrus (DG)) contributed to MAMPH-induced behavioral sensitization. The Cg1, IL, NAc, BLA, VTA, CPu, CA3, and DG also mediated STEE reductions in MAMPH-induced behavioral sensitization. This study indicates that all components of EE are crucial for ameliorating MAMPH-induced behavioral sensitization, as no individual EE component was able to effectively reduce MAMPH-induced behavioral sensitization. The present findings provide insight into the development of non-pharmacological interventions for reducing MAMPH-induced behavioral sensitization.

Citing Articles

Different Doses of Methamphetamine Are Needed to Produce Locomotor or Blood Pressure Sensitization in Mice.

Busceti C, Bucci D, De Lucia M, Ferrucci M, Scioli M, Carrizzo A Life (Basel). 2024; 14(6).

PMID: 38929706 PMC: 11205198. DOI: 10.3390/life14060723.


The systemic effects of the enriched environment on the conditioned fear reaction.

Grigoryan G Front Behav Neurosci. 2023; 17:1227575.

PMID: 37674611 PMC: 10477375. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1227575.

References
1.
Herbert C, Hughes R . A comparison of 1-benzylpiperazine and methamphetamine in their acute effects on anxiety-related behavior of hooded rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2008; 92(2):243-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2008.12.003. View

2.
Cao M, Pu T, Wang L, Marshall C, He H, Hu G . Early enriched physical environment reverses impairments of the hippocampus, but not medial prefrontal cortex, of socially-isolated mice. Brain Behav Immun. 2017; 64():232-243. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2017.04.009. View

3.
Weiss F, Ciccocioppo R, Parsons L, Katner S, Liu X, Zorrilla E . Compulsive drug-seeking behavior and relapse. Neuroadaptation, stress, and conditioning factors. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001; 937:1-26. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb03556.x. View

4.
Robinson T, Becker J . Enduring changes in brain and behavior produced by chronic amphetamine administration: a review and evaluation of animal models of amphetamine psychosis. Brain Res. 1986; 396(2):157-98. DOI: 10.1016/s0006-8993(86)80193-7. View

5.
Walsh R, Cummins R . The Open-Field Test: a critical review. Psychol Bull. 1976; 83(3):482-504. View