» Articles » PMID: 35681942

Is Telemedicine in Primary Care a Good Option for Polish Patients with Visual Impairments Outside of a Pandemic?

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2022 Jun 10
PMID 35681942
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

With the proliferation of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic, attention began to turn to the risk of health disparities associated with its use among people with disabilities. Therefore, the present study investigates the level of interest in using teleconsultations (TCs) in primary healthcare among people with visual impairments (PVIs) and identifies their motivations and needs. A total of 219 Polish PVIs were surveyed using a combination of closed and open questions. About 50% of the respondents expressed interest in using TCs. The factor most closely related to the willingness to use TCs was age. The predominant reason for using TCs was to obtain a prescription or referral, and the most highlighted need was the possibility to choose between a TC and an in-person visit. The blind and poor-sighted participants differed in some regards. Our study indicates that TCs, under some conditions, may be a beneficial option for PVIs, and provides some directions for its effective implementation.

Citing Articles

Outcomes of Telerehabilitation Versus In-Office Training With Magnification Devices for Low Vision: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Bittner A, Kaminski J, Yoshinaga P, Shepherd J, Chan T, Malkin A Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024; 13(1):6.

PMID: 38214688 PMC: 10790671. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.13.1.6.


Disabled people's experiences accessing healthcare services during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review.

McBride-Henry K, Nazari Orakani S, Good G, Roguski M, Officer T BMC Health Serv Res. 2023; 23(1):346.

PMID: 37024832 PMC: 10078067. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09336-4.


"To Be Treated as a Person and Not as a Disease Entity"-Expectations of People with Visual Impairments towards Primary Healthcare: Results of the Mixed-Method Survey in Poland.

Binder-Olibrowska K, Godycki-Cwirko M, Wrzesinska M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(20).

PMID: 36294098 PMC: 9602634. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192013519.

References
1.
Valdez R, Rogers C, Claypool H, Trieshmann L, Frye O, Wellbeloved-Stone C . Ensuring full participation of people with disabilities in an era of telehealth. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020; 28(2):389-392. PMC: 7717308. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa297. View

2.
Senjam S . The current advances in human-smartphone user interface design: An opportunity for people with vision loss. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021; 69(9):2544-2545. PMC: 8544093. DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_835_21. View

3.
Kruse C, Fohn J, Wilson N, Nunez Patlan E, Zipp S, Mileski M . Utilization Barriers and Medical Outcomes Commensurate With the Use of Telehealth Among Older Adults: Systematic Review. JMIR Med Inform. 2020; 8(8):e20359. PMC: 7450384. DOI: 10.2196/20359. View

4.
Alhashem A, Alquraini H, Chowdhury R . Factors influencing patient satisfaction in primary healthcare clinics in Kuwait. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2011; 24(3):249-62. DOI: 10.1108/09526861111116688. View

5.
Edwards L, Thomas C, Gregory A, Yardley L, OCathain A, Montgomery A . Are people with chronic diseases interested in using telehealth? A cross-sectional postal survey. J Med Internet Res. 2014; 16(5):e123. PMC: 4034113. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.3257. View