» Articles » PMID: 35678009

Variation in Adhesion of and in Saliva-derived Biofilms on Raw Materials of Orthodontic Brackets

Overview
Journal Korean J Orthod
Date 2022 Jun 9
PMID 35678009
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate differences in the adhesion levels of the most common oral pathogens, and , in human saliva-derived microcosm biofilms with respect to time and raw materials of orthodontic brackets.

Methods: The samples were classified into three groups of bracket materials: 1) monocrystalline alumina ceramic (CR), 2) stainless steel metal (SS), and 3) polycarbonate plastic (PL), and a hydroxyapatite (HA) group was used to mimic the enamel surface. Saliva was collected from a healthy donor, and saliva-derived biofilms were grown on each sample. A real-time polymerase chain reaction was performed to quantitatively evaluate differences in the attachment levels of total bacteria, and at days 1 and 4.

Results: Adhesion of and to CR and HA was higher than the other bracket materials (SS = PL < CR = HA). Total bacteria demonstrated higher adhesion to HA than to bracket materials, but no significant differences in adhesion were observed among the bracket materials (CR = SS = PL < HA). From days 1 to 4, the adhesion of decreased, while that of and total bacteria increased, regardless of material type.

Conclusions: The higher adhesion of oral pathogens, such as and to CR suggests that the use of CR brackets possibly facilitates gingival inflammation and enamel decalcification during orthodontic treatment.

Citing Articles

The effect of dental material type and masticatory forces on periodontitis-derived subgingival microbiomes.

Montoya C, Baraniya D, Chen T, Al-Hebshi N, Orrego S Biofilm. 2024; 7:100199.

PMID: 38800100 PMC: 11127099. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioflm.2024.100199.


Managing oral biofilms to avoid enamel demineralization during fixed orthodontic treatment.

An J, Lim B, Ahn S Korean J Orthod. 2023; 53(6):345-357.

PMID: 37989574 PMC: 10663579. DOI: 10.4041/kjod23.184.

References
1.
An J, Kim K, Cho S, Lim B, Ahn S . Compositional differences in multi-species biofilms formed on various orthodontic adhesives. Eur J Orthod. 2017; 39(5):528-533. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjw089. View

2.
Yin J, Shackel N, Zekry A, McGuinness P, Richards C, Putten K . Real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for measurement of cytokine and growth factor mRNA expression with fluorogenic probes or SYBR Green I. Immunol Cell Biol. 2001; 79(3):213-21. DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1711.2001.01002.x. View

3.
Nyvad B, Fejerskov O . Scanning electron microscopy of early microbial colonization of human enamel and root surfaces in vivo. Scand J Dent Res. 1987; 95(4):287-96. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1987.tb01844.x. View

4.
Bollen C, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M . Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater. 1997; 13(4):258-69. DOI: 10.1016/s0109-5641(97)80038-3. View

5.
Low B, Lee W, Seneviratne C, Samaranayake L, Hagg U . Ultrastructure and morphology of biofilms on thermoplastic orthodontic appliances in 'fast' and 'slow' plaque formers. Eur J Orthod. 2010; 33(5):577-83. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjq126. View