» Articles » PMID: 35668174

The Role of Population Structure in Computations Through Neural Dynamics

Overview
Journal Nat Neurosci
Date 2022 Jun 6
PMID 35668174
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Neural computations are currently investigated using two separate approaches: sorting neurons into functional subpopulations or examining the low-dimensional dynamics of collective activity. Whether and how these two aspects interact to shape computations is currently unclear. Using a novel approach to extract computational mechanisms from networks trained on neuroscience tasks, here we show that the dimensionality of the dynamics and subpopulation structure play fundamentally complementary roles. Although various tasks can be implemented by increasing the dimensionality in networks with fully random population structure, flexible input-output mappings instead require a non-random population structure that can be described in terms of multiple subpopulations. Our analyses revealed that such a subpopulation structure enables flexible computations through a mechanism based on gain-controlled modulations that flexibly shape the collective dynamics. Our results lead to task-specific predictions for the structure of neural selectivity, for inactivation experiments and for the implication of different neurons in multi-tasking.

Citing Articles

Neurons in auditory cortex integrate information within constrained temporal windows that are invariant to the stimulus context and information rate.

Sabat M, Gouyette H, Gaucher Q, Espejo M, David S, Norman-Haignere S bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39990450 PMC: 11844508. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.14.637944.


Computation-through-Dynamics Benchmark: Simulated datasets and quality metrics for dynamical models of neural activity.

Versteeg C, McCart J, Ostrow M, Zoltowski D, Washington C, Driscoll L bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39975240 PMC: 11839132. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.07.637062.


Deciphering neuronal variability across states reveals dynamic sensory encoding.

Akella S, Ledochowitsch P, Siegle J, Belski H, Denman D, Buice M Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):1768.

PMID: 39971911 PMC: 11839951. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-56733-w.


MARBLE: interpretable representations of neural population dynamics using geometric deep learning.

Gosztolai A, Peach R, Arnaudon A, Barahona M, Vandergheynst P Nat Methods. 2025; 22(3):612-620.

PMID: 39962310 PMC: 11903309. DOI: 10.1038/s41592-024-02582-2.


Latent circuit inference from heterogeneous neural responses during cognitive tasks.

Langdon C, Engel T Nat Neurosci. 2025; 28(3):665-675.

PMID: 39930096 PMC: 11893458. DOI: 10.1038/s41593-025-01869-7.


References
1.
Barack D, Krakauer J . Two views on the cognitive brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2021; 22(6):359-371. DOI: 10.1038/s41583-021-00448-6. View

2.
Sakai K . Task set and prefrontal cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2008; 31:219-45. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.060407.125642. View

3.
Miyashita Y . Neuronal correlate of visual associative long-term memory in the primate temporal cortex. Nature. 1988; 335(6193):817-20. DOI: 10.1038/335817a0. View

4.
Fusi S, Miller E, Rigotti M . Why neurons mix: high dimensionality for higher cognition. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2016; 37:66-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2016.01.010. View

5.
Buonomano D, Maass W . State-dependent computations: spatiotemporal processing in cortical networks. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009; 10(2):113-25. DOI: 10.1038/nrn2558. View