» Articles » PMID: 35666194

The Impact of Genetic Modifiers on Variation in Germline Mutation Rates Within and Among Human Populations

Overview
Journal Genetics
Specialty Genetics
Date 2022 Jun 6
PMID 35666194
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mutation rates and spectra differ among human populations. Here, we examine whether this variation could be explained by evolution at mutation modifiers. To this end, we consider genetic modifier sites at which mutations, "mutator alleles," increase genome-wide mutation rates and model their evolution under purifying selection due to the additional deleterious mutations that they cause, genetic drift, and demographic processes. We solve the model analytically for a constant population size and characterize how evolution at modifier sites impacts variation in mutation rates within and among populations. We then use simulations to study the effects of modifier sites under a plausible demographic model for Africans and Europeans. When comparing populations that evolve independently, weakly selected modifier sites (2Nes≈1), which evolve slowly, contribute the most to variation in mutation rates. In contrast, when populations recently split from a common ancestral population, strongly selected modifier sites (2Nes≫1), which evolve rapidly, contribute the most to variation between them. Moreover, a modest number of modifier sites (e.g. 10 per mutation type in the standard classification into 96 types) subject to moderate to strong selection (2Nes>1) could account for the variation in mutation rates observed among human populations. If such modifier sites indeed underlie differences among populations, they should also cause variation in mutation rates within populations and their effects should be detectable in pedigree studies.

Citing Articles

Population size interacts with reproductive longevity to shape the germline mutation rate.

Zhu L, Beichman A, Harris K bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39574678 PMC: 11580940. DOI: 10.1101/2023.12.06.570457.


Non-hypermutator cancers access driver mutations through reversals in germline mutational bias.

Tuffaha M, Castellano D, Serrano Colome C, Gutenkunst R, Wahl L bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38746331 PMC: 11092619. DOI: 10.1101/2024.04.30.591900.


Epistasis between mutator alleles contributes to germline mutation spectrum variability in laboratory mice.

Sasani T, Quinlan A, Harris K Elife. 2024; 12.

PMID: 38381482 PMC: 10942616. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.89096.


The divergence of mutation rates and spectra across the Tree of Life.

Lynch M, Ali F, Lin T, Wang Y, Ni J, Long H EMBO Rep. 2023; 24(10):e57561.

PMID: 37615267 PMC: 10561183. DOI: 10.15252/embr.202357561.


Epistasis between mutator alleles contributes to germline mutation spectra variability in laboratory mice.

Sasani T, Quinlan A, Harris K bioRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 37162999 PMC: 10168256. DOI: 10.1101/2023.04.25.537217.


References
1.
Scally A, Durbin R . Revising the human mutation rate: implications for understanding human evolution. Nat Rev Genet. 2012; 13(10):745-53. DOI: 10.1038/nrg3295. View

2.
Rodriguez-Galindo M, Casillas S, Weghorn D, Barbadilla A . Germline de novo mutation rates on exons versus introns in humans. Nat Commun. 2020; 11(1):3304. PMC: 7334200. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-17162-z. View

3.
Ward L, Kellis M . Evidence of abundant purifying selection in humans for recently acquired regulatory functions. Science. 2012; 337(6102):1675-8. PMC: 4104271. DOI: 10.1126/science.1225057. View

4.
Nachman M, Crowell S . Estimate of the mutation rate per nucleotide in humans. Genetics. 2000; 156(1):297-304. PMC: 1461236. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/156.1.297. View

5.
Sung W, Ackerman M, Miller S, Doak T, Lynch M . Drift-barrier hypothesis and mutation-rate evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012; 109(45):18488-92. PMC: 3494944. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1216223109. View