» Articles » PMID: 35665988

Sensitive Caregiving and Reward Responsivity: A Novel Mechanism Linking Parenting and Executive Functions Development in Early Childhood

Overview
Journal Dev Sci
Specialty Psychology
Date 2022 Jun 6
PMID 35665988
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Sensitive caregiving is an essential aspect of positive parenting that influences executive functions development, but the mechanisms underlying this association are less clear. Using data from the Family Life Project, a large prospective longitudinal sample of 1292 families residing in rural, predominately low-income communities, the current study examined whether sensitive caregiving impacts executive functions development by shaping behavioral reward processing systems in early postnatal life. Results indicated that higher levels of sensitive caregiving during infancy were associated with heightened reward responsivity at age 4, which in turn predicted superior executive functions ability at age 5. Notably, children's reward responsivity partially mediated the relationship between sensitive caregiving in infancy and executive functions ability at school entry. These findings add to prior work on early experience and children's executive functions and highlight caregiver scaffolding of developing reward processing systems as a potential foundational mechanism for supporting adaptive behavior and self-regulation across the lifespan.

Citing Articles

Linking caregiving quality during infancy to brain activity in early childhood and later executive function.

Wade M, Parker V, Tang A, Fox N, Zeanah C, Nelson C Dev Sci. 2024; 27(6):e13517.

PMID: 38654410 PMC: 11489018. DOI: 10.1111/desc.13517.


Parental stress and child stimulation practices: examining associations with child developmental outcomes over time in Kenya and Zambia.

Okelo K, Murray A, King J, Kitsao-Wekulo P, Onyango S, Nampijja M BMC Psychol. 2024; 12(1):50.

PMID: 38279153 PMC: 10811884. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-024-01533-y.

References
1.
Luking K, Pagliaccio D, Luby J, Barch D . Reward Processing and Risk for Depression Across Development. Trends Cogn Sci. 2016; 20(6):456-468. PMC: 4875800. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.04.002. View

2.
Haber S, Knutson B . The reward circuit: linking primate anatomy and human imaging. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009; 35(1):4-26. PMC: 3055449. DOI: 10.1038/npp.2009.129. View

3.
Pfeiffer U, Schilbach L, Timmermans B, Kuzmanovic B, Georgescu A, Bente G . Why we interact: on the functional role of the striatum in the subjective experience of social interaction. Neuroimage. 2014; 101:124-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.061. View

4.
Hammond S, Muller U, Carpendale J, Bibok M, Liebermann-Finestone D . The effects of parental scaffolding on preschoolers' executive function. Dev Psychol. 2011; 48(1):271-81. DOI: 10.1037/a0025519. View

5.
Rosen M, Sheridan M, Sambrook K, Meltzoff A, McLaughlin K . Socioeconomic disparities in academic achievement: A multi-modal investigation of neural mechanisms in children and adolescents. Neuroimage. 2018; 173:298-310. PMC: 5944356. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.02.043. View