» Articles » PMID: 35665770

Prostate Cancer Histopathology Using Label-free Multispectral Deep-UV Microscopy Quantifies Phenotypes of Tumor Aggressiveness and Enables Multiple Diagnostic Virtual Stains

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2022 Jun 6
PMID 35665770
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Identifying prostate cancer patients that are harboring aggressive forms of prostate cancer remains a significant clinical challenge. Here we develop an approach based on multispectral deep-ultraviolet (UV) microscopy that provides novel quantitative insight into the aggressiveness and grade of this disease, thus providing a new tool to help address this important challenge. We find that UV spectral signatures from endogenous molecules give rise to a phenotypical continuum that provides unique structural insight (i.e., molecular maps or "optical stains") of thin tissue sections with subcellular (nanoscale) resolution. We show that this phenotypical continuum can also be applied as a surrogate biomarker of prostate cancer malignancy, where patients with the most aggressive tumors show a ubiquitous glandular phenotypical shift. In addition to providing several novel "optical stains" with contrast for disease, we also adapt a two-part Cycle-consistent Generative Adversarial Network to translate the label-free deep-UV images into virtual hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained images, thus providing multiple stains (including the gold-standard H&E) from the same unlabeled specimen. Agreement between the virtual H&E images and the H&E-stained tissue sections is evaluated by a panel of pathologists who find that the two modalities are in excellent agreement. This work has significant implications towards improving our ability to objectively quantify prostate cancer grade and aggressiveness, thus improving the management and clinical outcomes of prostate cancer patients. This same approach can also be applied broadly in other tumor types to achieve low-cost, stain-free, quantitative histopathological analysis.

Citing Articles

Quantifying UV-induced photodamage for longitudinal live-cell imaging applications of deep-UV microscopy.

Gorti V, McCubbins K, Houston D, Silva Trenkle A, Holberton A, Serafini C Biomed Opt Express. 2025; 16(1):208-221.

PMID: 39816147 PMC: 11729288. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.544778.


Distinguishing of Histopathological Staging Features of H-E Stained Human cSCC by Microscopical Multispectral Imaging.

Wu R, Yang J, Chen Q, Yang C, Ge Q, Rui D Biosensors (Basel). 2024; 14(10).

PMID: 39451680 PMC: 11506349. DOI: 10.3390/bios14100467.


Metabolic light absorption, scattering, and emission (MetaLASE) microscopy.

Restall B, Haven N, Martell M, Cikaluk B, Wang J, Kedarisetti P Sci Adv. 2024; 10(42):eadl5729.

PMID: 39423271 PMC: 11488571. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adl5729.


Deep-ultraviolet Fourier ptychography (DUV-FP) for label-free biochemical imaging via feature-domain optimization.

Zhao Q, Wang R, Zhang S, Wang T, Song P, Zheng G APL Photonics. 2024; 9(9):090801.

PMID: 39301193 PMC: 11409226. DOI: 10.1063/5.0227038.


Deep learning-assisted low-cost autofluorescence microscopy for rapid slide-free imaging with virtual histological staining.

Wong I, Chen Z, Shi L, Lo C, Kang L, Dai W Biomed Opt Express. 2024; 15(4):2187-2201.

PMID: 38633074 PMC: 11019672. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.515018.


References
1.
Spicer G, Azarin S, Yi J, Young S, Ellis R, Bauer G . Detection of extracellular matrix modification in cancer models with inverse spectroscopic optical coherence tomography. Phys Med Biol. 2016; 61(19):6892-6904. PMC: 5056859. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/19/6892. View

2.
Li X, Zhang G, Qiao H, Bao F, Deng Y, Wu J . Unsupervised content-preserving transformation for optical microscopy. Light Sci Appl. 2021; 10(1):44. PMC: 7921581. DOI: 10.1038/s41377-021-00484-y. View

3.
German M, Hammiche A, Ragavan N, Tobin M, Cooper L, Matanhelia S . Infrared spectroscopy with multivariate analysis potentially facilitates the segregation of different types of prostate cell. Biophys J. 2006; 90(10):3783-95. PMC: 1440759. DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.105.077255. View

4.
Michiels S, Koscielny S, Hill C . Prediction of cancer outcome with microarrays: a multiple random validation strategy. Lancet. 2005; 365(9458):488-92. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17866-0. View

5.
Zhou A, Salles D, Samarska I, Epstein J . How Are Gleason Scores Categorized in the Current Literature: An Analysis and Comparison of Articles Published in 2016-2017. Eur Urol. 2018; 75(1):25-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.07.021. View