» Articles » PMID: 35664264

Timing of the Pre-transplant Workup for Renal Transplantation: is There Room for Improvement?

Abstract

Background: Since patient survival after kidney transplantation is significantly improved with a shorter time on dialysis, it is recommended to start the transplant workup in a timely fashion.

Methods: This retrospective study analyses the chronology of actions taken during the care for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 5 who were waitlisted for a first kidney transplant at the Antwerp University Hospital between 2016 and 2019. We aimed to identify risk factors for a delayed start of the transplant workup (i.e. after dialysis initiation) and factors that prolong its duration.

Results: Of the 161 patients included, only 43% started the transplant workup before starting dialysis. We identified the number of hospitalization days {odds ratio [OR] 0.79 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-0.89]; P < 0.001}, language barriers [OR 0.20 (95% CI 0.06-0.61); P = 0.005] and a shorter nephrology follow-up before CKD stage 5 [OR 0.99 (95% CI 1.0-0.98); P = 0.034] as factors having a significant negative impact on the probability of starting the transplant screening before dialysis. The workup took a median of 8.6 months (interquartile range 5-14) to complete. The number of hospitalization days significantly prolonged its duration.

Conclusion: The transplant workup was often started too late and the time needed to complete it was surprisingly long. By starting the transplant workup in a timely fashion and reducing the time spent on the screening examinations, we should be able to register patients on the waiting list before or at least at the start of dialysis. We believe that such an internal audit could be of value for every transplant centre.

Citing Articles

The evaluation of kidney transplant candidates prior to waitlisting: a scoping review.

Boerstra B, Pippias M, Kramer A, Dirix M, Daams J, Jager K Clin Kidney J. 2025; 18(1):sfae377.

PMID: 40008352 PMC: 11852345. DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfae377.


Development of a checklist framework for kidney transplantation.

Nicolau-Raducu R, Ciancio G, Raveh Y Front Transplant. 2024; 3:1412391.

PMID: 38993790 PMC: 11235342. DOI: 10.3389/frtra.2024.1412391.


Time trends in preemptive kidney transplantation in Europe: an ERA registry study.

Kramer A, Boenink R, Mercado Vergara C, Bell S, Kerschbaum J, Arevalo O Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2024; 39(12):2100-2112.

PMID: 38724446 PMC: 11648960. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfae105.

References
1.
Abramowicz D, Cochat P, Claas F, Heemann U, Pascual J, Dudley C . European Renal Best Practice Guideline on kidney donor and recipient evaluation and perioperative care. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014; 30(11):1790-7. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfu216. View

2.
Haller M, Kammer M, Oberbauer R . Dialysis vintage and outcomes in renal transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2018; 34(4):555-560. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfy099. View

3.
Abramowicz D, Hazzan M, Maggiore U, Peruzzi L, Cochat P, Oberbauer R . Does pre-emptive transplantation versus post start of dialysis transplantation with a kidney from a living donor improve outcomes after transplantation? A systematic literature review and position statement by the Descartes Working Group and ERBP. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015; 31(5):691-7. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfv378. View

4.
Fowler K . Accountability of Dialysis Facilities in Transplant Referral: CMS Needs to Collect National Data on Dialysis Facility Kidney Transplant Referrals. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018; 13(2):193-194. PMC: 5967441. DOI: 10.2215/CJN.13741217. View

5.
Kasiske B, Snyder J, Matas A, Ellison M, Gill J, Kausz A . Preemptive kidney transplantation: the advantage and the advantaged. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002; 13(5):1358-64. DOI: 10.1097/01.asn.0000013295.11876.c9. View