» Articles » PMID: 35663221

Evaluation of Perfusion Index As an Objective Tool to Assess Analgesia During Laparoscopic Surgeries Under General Anaesthesia

Overview
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 2022 Jun 6
PMID 35663221
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Aims: Changes in the sympathetic nervous system by pain can impact smooth muscle tone and can alter perfusion. This can be monitored by perfusion index (PI). It is a non-invasive, indirect, and continuous measure of peripheral perfusion. This study investigates the changes in PI due to painful stimuli under general anaesthesia.

Methods: Twenty patients between the ages of 20 and 45 years, with informed consent, who were undergoing elective laparoscopic procedure, and belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status class I were connected with standard monitors along with SEDLINE, pulse oximetry (Root, Masimo Corporation®, Irvine, CA, USA) to monitor PI and Pleth-Variability Index (PVi). General anaesthesia was administered. PI, PVi, heart rate (HR), and non-invasive blood pressure were recorded pre-induction, during induction, before and after intubation, at the time of pneumoperitoneum (P0), and first laparoscopic port insertion (P1). Later, intravenous injection of fentanyl 0.5 μg/kg was administered and values were recorded at the second (P2) and third (P3) port insertion. The aforementioned parameters were recorded for up to 30 minutes. Statistical confirmation was done through paired tests.

Results: PI values after fentanyl increased from 5.33 ± 2.67 (P1) to 5.99 ± 2.8 (P2) ( < 0.001), and to 6.3 ± 2.88 (P3) ( < 0.001). This increase correlated with a decrease in HR, from 101.42 ± 12.53 (P1) to 87.93 ± 10.98 (P2) ( < 0.001), and to 83 ± 10.82 (P3) ( < 0.001).

Conclusion: PI can be a tool to monitor the nociception in anaesthetised patients when administering analgesia.

Citing Articles

Comparing Perfusion Index and Visual Analogue Scores for Postoperative Pain Assessment Following Upper Limb Surgeries Under Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: An Observational Study.

Bihani P, Pandey A, Jha M, Paliwal N, Jaju R, Solanki R Cureus. 2024; 16(3):e55529.

PMID: 38576659 PMC: 10993003. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.55529.


Trends in research in - A bibliometric analysis.

Parab S, Thakkar V Indian J Anaesth. 2024; 67(12):1130-1132.

PMID: 38343685 PMC: 10858699. DOI: 10.4103/ija.ija_937_23.


Exploring statistical analysis in medical research: A journey of self, with a statistician or both.

Gupta L, Gupta B, Chaudhary K Indian J Anaesth. 2023; 67(10):927-929.

PMID: 38044916 PMC: 10691598. DOI: 10.4103/ija.ija_833_23.


Reliability of analgesia nociception index (ANI) and surgical pleth index (SPI) during episodes of bleeding - A pilot study.

Muthukalai S, Bansal S, Chakrabarti D, Rao G Indian J Anaesth. 2022; 66(7):505-510.

PMID: 36111088 PMC: 9469000. DOI: 10.4103/ija.ija_20_22.

References
1.
Chu C, Huang Y, Chen Y, Lai L, Yeh H . An observational study: The utility of perfusion index as a discharge criterion for pain assessment in the postanesthesia care unit. PLoS One. 2018; 13(5):e0197630. PMC: 5955537. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197630. View

2.
Sriganesh K, Theerth K, Reddy M, Chakrabarti D, Umamaheswara Rao G . Analgesia nociception index and systemic haemodynamics during anaesthetic induction and tracheal intubation: A secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2019; 63(2):100-105. PMC: 6383488. DOI: 10.4103/ija.IJA_656_18. View

3.
Gruenewald M, Dempfle A . Analgesia/nociception monitoring for opioid guidance: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Minerva Anestesiol. 2016; 83(2):200-213. DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.16.11602-5. View

4.
Lee J, Choi B, Jung Y, Lee Y, Bang J, Noh G . Evaluation of Surgical Pleth Index and Analgesia Nociception Index as surrogate pain measures in conscious postoperative patients: an observational study. J Clin Monit Comput. 2019; 34(5):1087-1093. DOI: 10.1007/s10877-019-00399-5. View

5.
Atef H, Fattah S, Gaffer M, Al Rahman A . Perfusion index versus non-invasive hemodynamic parameters during insertion of i-gel, classic laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube. Indian J Anaesth. 2013; 57(2):156-62. PMC: 3696263. DOI: 10.4103/0019-5049.111843. View