Predicting Motor Function Recovery in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury-induced Complete Paralysis with Reflex Response

Overview

Journal Spinal Cord

Specialty Neurology

Date 2022 Jun 6

PMID 35662288

Authors

Hironari Kaneyama

Osamu Kawano

Yuichiro Morishita

Takuaki Yamamoto

Takeshi Maeda

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Study Design: A retrospective clinical study.

Objective: To elucidate the usefulness of the patellar tendon reflex (PTR), bulbocavernosus reflex (BCR), and plantar response (PR) as factors in the prognostic prediction of motor function in complete paralysis due to cervical spinal cord injuries (CSCIs) at the acute phase.

Setting: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Spinal Injuries Center, Japan.

Methods: 99 patients assessed as the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grade A (AIS A) were included in this study. The PTR, BCR, and PR were evaluated respectively as positive or negative at the time of injury. We classified the patients into two groups based on their neurological recovery at 3 months after injury: "recovered" group was defined as AIS C, D, or E; "non-recovered" group was defined as AIS A or B.

Results: Eight patients demonstrated positive PTR, while 91 demonstrated negative. Three out of eight patients with positive PTR (37.5%) were R group, while 83 out of 91 patients with negative PTR (91.2%) were N group. A significant difference was observed (p = 0.043). For BCR, no significant difference was observed (p > 0.05). Twenty-six patients demonstrated positive PTR, while 73 demonstrated negative. Nine out of twenty-six patients with positive PR (34.6%) were R group, while 71 out of 73 patients with negative PR (97.3%) were N group. A significant difference was observed (p = 0.000068).

Conclusion: The PTR and PR are useful for poor prognostic prediction of motor function in CSCI at the acute phase.

References

Frankel H, Hancock D, Hyslop G, MELZAK J, MICHAELIS L, UNGAR G . The value of postural reduction in the initial management of closed injuries of the spine with paraplegia and tetraplegia. I. Paraplegia. 1969; 7(3):179-92. DOI: 10.1038/sc.1969.30. View

Kawano O, Maeda T, Mori E, Takao T, Sakai H, Masuda M . How much time is necessary to confirm the diagnosis of permanent complete cervical spinal cord injury?. Spinal Cord. 2019; 58(3):284-289. DOI: 10.1038/s41393-019-0366-1. View

Boes C . The history of examination of reflexes. J Neurol. 2014; 261(12):2264-74. DOI: 10.1007/s00415-014-7326-7. View

Boldin C, Raith J, Fankhauser F, Haunschmid C, Schwantzer G, Schweighofer F . Predicting neurologic recovery in cervical spinal cord injury with postoperative MR imaging. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31(5):554-9. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000201274.59427.a4. View

Flanders A, Spettell C, Tartaglino L, Friedman D, Herbison G . Forecasting motor recovery after cervical spinal cord injury: value of MR imaging. Radiology. 1996; 201(3):649-55. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.201.3.8939210. View

Miyanji F, Furlan J, Aarabi B, Arnold P, Fehlings M . Acute cervical traumatic spinal cord injury: MR imaging findings correlated with neurologic outcome--prospective study with 100 consecutive patients. Radiology. 2007; 243(3):820-7. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2433060583. View

Curt A, Dietz V . Ambulatory capacity in spinal cord injury: significance of somatosensory evoked potentials and ASIA protocol in predicting outcome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997; 78(1):39-43. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(97)90007-1. View

Curt A, Dietz V . Electrophysiological recordings in patients with spinal cord injury: significance for predicting outcome. Spinal Cord. 1999; 37(3):157-65. DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100809. View

Jacobs S, Yeaney N, Herbison G, Ditunno Jr J . Future ambulation prognosis as predicted by somatosensory evoked potentials in motor complete and incomplete quadriplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995; 76(7):635-41. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(95)80632-6. View

10.

Xie J, Boakye M . Electrophysiological outcomes after spinal cord injury. Neurosurg Focus. 2008; 25(5):E11. DOI: 10.3171/FOC.2008.25.11.E11. View

11.

Calancie B, Molano M, Broton J . Abductor hallucis for monitoring lower-limb recovery after spinal cord injury in man. Spinal Cord. 2004; 42(10):573-80. DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101640. View

12.

Calancie B, Molano M, Broton J . Tendon reflexes for predicting movement recovery after acute spinal cord injury in humans. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004; 115(10):2350-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.04.028. View

13.

Kobayakawa K, Kumamaru H, Saiwai H, Kubota K, Ohkawa Y, Kishimoto J . Acute hyperglycemia impairs functional improvement after spinal cord injury in mice and humans. Sci Transl Med. 2014; 6(256):256ra137. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3009430. View

14.

Kijima K, Kubota K, Hara M, Kobayakawa K, Yokota K, Saito T . The acute phase serum zinc concentration is a reliable biomarker for predicting the functional outcome after spinal cord injury. EBioMedicine. 2019; 41:659-669. PMC: 6444130. DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.03.003. View

15.

Ko H, Ditunno Jr J, Graziani V, Little J . The pattern of reflex recovery during spinal shock. Spinal Cord. 1999; 37(6):402-9. DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100840. View

16.

Ditunno J, Little J, Tessler A, Burns A . Spinal shock revisited: a four-phase model. Spinal Cord. 2004; 42(7):383-95. DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101603. View

17.

Morishita K, Kasai Y, Ueta T, Shiba K, Akeda K, Uchida A . Patellar tendon reflex as a predictor of improving motor paralysis in complete paralysis due to cervical cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2009; 47(8):640-2. DOI: 10.1038/sc.2009.8. View

18.

Scivoletto G, Morganti B, Ditunno P, Ditunno J, Molinari M . Effects on age on spinal cord lesion patients' rehabilitation. Spinal Cord. 2003; 41(8):457-64. DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101489. View

19.

Johansson E, Luoto T, Vainionpaa A, Kauppila A, Kallinen M, Vaarala E . Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury in Finland. Spinal Cord. 2020; 59(7):761-768. PMC: 7610166. DOI: 10.1038/s41393-020-00575-4. View

20.

Previnaire J . The importance of the bulbocavernosus reflex. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2018; 4:2. PMC: 5798690. DOI: 10.1038/s41394-017-0012-0. View