Population Niche Width is Driven by Within-individual Niche Expansion and Individual Specialization in Introduced Brook Trout in Mountain Lakes

Overview

Journal Oecologia

Specialty Environmental Health

Date 2022 Jun 6

PMID 35661919

Authors

H K Baker

C E F Bruggeman

J B Shurin

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The width of a population's resource-use niche is determined by individual diet breadth ("within-individual component") and the degree of niche partitioning between individuals ("between-individual component"). The balance between these two factors affects ecological stability and evolutionary trajectories, and may shift as ecological opportunity permits broader population niches. Lakes in California's Sierra Nevada Mountains vary in resource diversity for introduced brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) due to elevation, lake morphometry, and watershed features. We compared the relative contributions of within- and between-individual niche components to two measures of the dietary niches of thirteen populations of brook trout: prey taxonomic composition and prey size distribution. For both taxonomic and size diversity of fish diets, population niche width was positively related to both the within- and between-individual components. For taxonomic diversity, the two components increased in parallel, while for size diversity, the between-individual component became more important relative to the within-individual component in populations with the greatest niche widths. Our results support the Niche Variation Hypothesis that populations with broader niches are more heterogeneous among individuals and show that individual niche width and individual specialization can operate in parallel to expand the population niche.

Citing Articles

Trophic niche adaptation of mountain frogs around the Sichuan Basin: individual specialization and response to climate variations.

Cui K, Yang S, Hu J Front Zool. 2024; 21(1):32.

PMID: 39696581 PMC: 11657682. DOI: 10.1186/s12983-024-00553-z.

References

Araujo M, Costa-Pereira R . Latitudinal gradients in intraspecific ecological diversity. Biol Lett. 2013; 9(6):20130778. PMC: 3871364. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0778. View

Araujo M, Bolnick D, Layman C . The ecological causes of individual specialisation. Ecol Lett. 2011; 14(9):948-58. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01662.x. View

Araujo M, Guimaraes Jr P, Svanback R, Pinheiro A, Guimaraes P, Dos Reis S . Network analysis reveals contrasting effects of intraspecific competition on individual vs. population diets. Ecology. 2008; 89(7):1981-93. DOI: 10.1890/07-0630.1. View

Bolnick D, Ballare K . Resource diversity promotes among-individual diet variation, but not genomic diversity, in lake stickleback. Ecol Lett. 2020; 23(3):495-505. PMC: 7325224. DOI: 10.1111/ele.13448. View

Bolnick D, Amarasekare P, Araujo M, Burger R, Levine J, Novak M . Why intraspecific trait variation matters in community ecology. Trends Ecol Evol. 2011; 26(4):183-92. PMC: 3088364. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.01.009. View

Bolnick D, Svanback R, Fordyce J, Yang L, Davis J, Hulsey C . The ecology of individuals: incidence and implications of individual specialization. Am Nat. 2003; 161(1):1-28. DOI: 10.1086/343878. View

Bolnick D, Svanback R, Araujo M, Persson L . Comparative support for the niche variation hypothesis that more generalized populations also are more heterogeneous. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(24):10075-9. PMC: 1891261. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0703743104. View

Costa G, Mesquita D, Colli G, Vitt L . Niche expansion and the niche variation hypothesis: does the degree of individual variation increase in depauperate assemblages?. Am Nat. 2008; 172(6):868-77. DOI: 10.1086/592998. View

Herrmann N, Stroud J, Losos J . The Evolution of 'Ecological Release' into the 21st Century. Trends Ecol Evol. 2020; 36(3):206-215. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2020.10.019. View

10.

Hessen D, Faafeng B, Smith V, Bakkestuen V, Walseng B . Extrinsic and intrinsic controls of zooplankton diversity in lakes. Ecology. 2006; 87(2):433-43. DOI: 10.1890/05-0352. View

11.

Hsu Y, Shaner P, Chang C, Ke L, Kao S . Trophic niche width increases with bill-size variation in a generalist passerine: a test of niche variation hypothesis. J Anim Ecol. 2013; 83(2):450-9. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12152. View

12.

Ingram T, Costa-Pereira R, Araujo M . The dimensionality of individual niche variation. Ecology. 2017; 99(3):536-549. DOI: 10.1002/ecy.2129. View

13.

Jackson A, Inger R, Parnell A, Bearhop S . Comparing isotopic niche widths among and within communities: SIBER - Stable Isotope Bayesian Ellipses in R. J Anim Ecol. 2011; 80(3):595-602. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01806.x. View

14.

Schreiber S, Burger R, Bolnick D . The community effects of phenotypic and genetic variation within a predator population. Ecology. 2011; 92(8):1582-93. DOI: 10.1890/10-2071.1. View

15.

Yurkowski D, Ferguson S, Choy E, Loseto L, Brown T, Muir D . Latitudinal variation in ecological opportunity and intraspecific competition indicates differences in niche variability and diet specialization of Arctic marine predators. Ecol Evol. 2016; 6(6):1666-78. PMC: 4752956. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1980. View