» Articles » PMID: 35659996

The Expanding Horizons of Network Neuroscience: From Description to Prediction and Control

Overview
Journal Neuroimage
Specialty Radiology
Date 2022 Jun 6
PMID 35659996
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The field of network neuroscience has emerged as a natural framework for the study of the brain and has been increasingly applied across divergent problems in neuroscience. From a disciplinary perspective, network neuroscience originally emerged as a formal integration of graph theory (from mathematics) and neuroscience (from biology). This early integration afforded marked utility in describing the interconnected nature of neural units, both structurally and functionally, and underscored the relevance of that interconnection for cognition and behavior. But since its inception, the field has not remained static in its methodological composition. Instead, it has grown to use increasingly advanced graph-theoretic tools and to bring in several other disciplinary perspectives-including machine learning and systems engineering-that have proven complementary. In doing so, the problem space amenable to the discipline has expanded markedly. In this review, we discuss three distinct flavors of investigation in state-of-the-art network neuroscience: (i) descriptive network neuroscience, (ii) predictive network neuroscience, and (iii) a perturbative network neuroscience that draws on recent advances in network control theory. In considering each area, we provide a brief summary of the approaches, discuss the nature of the insights obtained, and highlight future directions.

Citing Articles

Development of the brain network control theory and its implications.

Wu Z, Huang L, Wang M, He X Psychoradiology. 2025; 4():kkae028.

PMID: 39845725 PMC: 11753174. DOI: 10.1093/psyrad/kkae028.


The digital twin in neuroscience: from theory to tailored therapy.

Fekonja L, Schenk R, Schroder E, Tomasello R, Tomsic S, Picht T Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1454856.

PMID: 39376542 PMC: 11457707. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1454856.


Statistical Brain Network Analysis.

Simpson S, Shappell H, Bahrami M Annu Rev Stat Appl. 2024; 11:505-531.

PMID: 39184922 PMC: 11343573. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-statistics-040522-020722.


Functional brain networks are associated with both sex and gender in children.

Dhamala E, Bassett D, Yeo B, Holmes A Sci Adv. 2024; 10(28):eadn4202.

PMID: 38996031 PMC: 11244548. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adn4202.


Edge-Community Entropy Is a Novel Neural Correlate of Aging and Moderator of Fluid Cognition.

Shankar A, Tanner J, Mao T, Betzel R, Prakash R J Neurosci. 2024; 44(25).

PMID: 38719449 PMC: 11209649. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1701-23.2024.


References
1.
Gotts S, Gilmore A, Martin A . Brain networks, dimensionality, and global signal averaging in resting-state fMRI: Hierarchical network structure results in low-dimensional spatiotemporal dynamics. Neuroimage. 2019; 205:116289. PMC: 6919311. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116289. View

2.
Stam C . Functional connectivity patterns of human magnetoencephalographic recordings: a 'small-world' network?. Neurosci Lett. 2004; 355(1-2):25-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2003.10.063. View

3.
Tang E, Ju H, Baum G, Roalf D, Satterthwaite T, Pasqualetti F . Control of brain network dynamics across diverse scales of space and time. Phys Rev E. 2020; 101(6-1):062301. PMC: 8728948. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.101.062301. View

4.
Li L, Violante I, Leech R, Ross E, Hampshire A, Opitz A . Brain state and polarity dependent modulation of brain networks by transcranial direct current stimulation. Hum Brain Mapp. 2018; 40(3):904-915. PMC: 6387619. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24420. View

5.
McKeown M, Hansen L, Sejnowsk T . Independent component analysis of functional MRI: what is signal and what is noise?. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2003; 13(5):620-9. PMC: 2925426. DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2003.09.012. View