» Articles » PMID: 35658864

Cardiovascular Benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetes, Interaction with Metformin and Role of Erythrocytosis: a Self-controlled Case Series Study

Abstract

Background: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have proven cardiovascular benefits in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). This self-controlled case series study aims to evaluate whether metformin use and SGLT2i-associated erythrocytosis influence its cardiovascular benefits.

Methods: T2D patients with metformin and/or SGLT2i prescriptions between 2015 and 2020 were identified from the Hong Kong population. Study outcomes were composite cardiovascular diseases (CVD), coronary heart disease (CHD), hospitalisation for heart failure (HHF), stroke, and erythrocytosis. Risk periods were patient-time divided into four mutually exclusive windows: (i) 'baseline period' of metformin use without SGLT2i; (ii) pre-SGLT2i period; (iii) exposure to SGLT2i without metformin; and (iv) exposure to the drug combination. Another SCCS model was applied to evaluate the association between erythrocytosis and cardiovascular outcomes regarding SGLT2i exposure. Four mutually exclusive risk periods included (i) SGLT2i exposure with erythrocytosis; (ii) SGLT2i exposure without erythrocytosis; (iii) absence of SGLT2i exposure with erythrocytosis; and (iv) absence of SGLT2i exposure without erythrocytosis. Incidence rate ratios (IRR) of events at different risk periods were estimated using conditional Poisson regression model.

Results: Among 20,861 patients with metformin and/or SGLT2i prescriptions, 2575 and 1700 patients with events of composite CVD and erythrocytosis were identified, respectively. Compared to metformin use without SGLT2i, SGLT2i initiation was associated with lower risks of composite CVD, CHD, and HHF-regardless of the presence (CVD: IRR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.37-0.51; CHD: IRR = 0.44, 95% CI 0.37-0.53; HHF: IRR = 0.29, 95% CI 0.22-0.40; all p < 0.001) and absence of concomitant metformin (CVD: IRR = 0.31, 95% CI 0.20-0.48; CHD: IRR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.25-0.59; HHF: IRR = 0.17, 95% CI 0.09-0.31; all p < 0.001); while SGLT2i was neutral on stroke risk. Compared to metformin-SGLT2i combination, exposure to SGLT2i alone was associated with comparable risks of all cardiovascular outcomes (all p > 0.05). Incidence rates of erythrocytosis at baseline, SGLT2i without and with metformin use periods were 0.75, 3.06 and 3.27 per 100 person-years, respectively. SGLT2i users who developed erythrocytosis had lower risk of HHF (IRR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.14-0.99, p = 0.049) than those who did not.

Conclusions: Our real-world data suggested that SGLT2i-associated cardiovascular benefits were not attenuated by metformin use. Further studies will delineate the role of erythrocytosis as a surrogate marker of SGLT2i-associated cardiovascular benefit in reducing HHF.

Citing Articles

Prevalence and predictive factors of testosterone-induced erythrocytosis: a retrospective single center study.

Neidhart A, von Wyl V, Kaslin B, Henzen C, Fischli S Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025; 15:1496906.

PMID: 39882268 PMC: 11774685. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1496906.


SGLT2 inhibition, venous thrombolism, and death due to cardiac causes: a mediation Mendelian randomization study.

Shi L, Wei X, Luo J, Tu L Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1339094.

PMID: 38803667 PMC: 11128626. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1339094.


Protective Mechanisms of SGLTi in Ischemic Heart Disease.

Liao L, Wang T, Zhang L, Wei Y, Fan X J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2024; 17(5):1018-1035.

PMID: 38767796 DOI: 10.1007/s12265-024-10513-x.


The effect of SGLT2i on in-hospital acute heart failure risk in acute myocardial infarction patients-a retrospective study.

Zhu Y, Zhang J, Jin H, Ji Y, Wang F Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023; 10:1158507.

PMID: 37260943 PMC: 10228823. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1158507.


Risks of stroke, its subtypes and atrial fibrillation associated with glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists versus sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors: a real-world population-based cohort study in Hong Kong.

Lui D, Tang E, Wu T, Au I, Lee C, Woo Y Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023; 22(1):40.

PMID: 36829226 PMC: 9960638. DOI: 10.1186/s12933-023-01772-0.

References
1.
Sawicki K, Ardehali H . Intravenous Iron Therapy in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: Tackling the Deficiency. Circulation. 2021; 144(4):253-255. PMC: 8323966. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.054271. View

2.
Cahn A, Wiviott S, Mosenzon O, Murphy S, Goodrich E, Yanuv I . Cardiorenal outcomes with dapagliflozin by baseline glucose-lowering agents: Post hoc analyses from DECLARE-TIMI 58. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020; 23(1):29-38. DOI: 10.1111/dom.14179. View

3.
Wanner C, Inzucchi S, Zinman B, Koitka-Weber A, Mattheus M, George J . Consistent effects of empagliflozin on cardiovascular and kidney outcomes irrespective of diabetic kidney disease categories: Insights from the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020; 22(12):2335-2347. DOI: 10.1111/dom.14158. View

4.
Zannad F, Ferreira J, Pocock S, Anker S, Butler J, Filippatos G . SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a meta-analysis of the EMPEROR-Reduced and DAPA-HF trials. Lancet. 2020; 396(10254):819-829. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31824-9. View

5.
Packer M . Are the benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors in heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction influenced by background therapy? Expectations and realities of a new standard of care. Eur Heart J. 2020; 41(25):2393-2396. PMC: 7327531. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa344. View