» Articles » PMID: 35656979

Predictors of Recurrent Stroke After Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source in the RE-SPECT ESUS Trial

Abstract

Background We sought to determine recurrent stroke predictors among patients with embolic strokes of undetermined source (ESUS). Methods and Results We applied Cox proportional hazards models to identify clinical features associated with recurrent stroke among participants enrolled in RE-SPECT ESUS (Randomized, Double-Blind, Evaluation in Secondary Stroke Prevention Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of the Oral Thrombin Inhibitor Dabigatran Etexilate Versus Acetylsalicylic Acid in Patients With Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source) trial, an international clinical trial evaluating dabigatran versus aspirin for patients with ESUS. During a median follow-up of 19 months, 384 of 5390 participants had recurrent stroke (annual rate, 4.5%). Multivariable models revealed that stroke or transient ischemic attack before the index event (hazard ratio [HR], 2.27 [95% CI, 1.83-2.82]), creatinine clearance <50 mL/min (HR, 1.69 [95% CI, 1.23-2.32]), male sex (HR, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.27-2.02]), and CHADS-VASc ≥4 (HR, 1.55 [95% CI, 1.15-2.08] and HR, 1.66 [95% CI, 1.21-2.26] for scores of 4 and ≥5, respectively) versus CHADS-VASc of 2 to 3, were independent predictors for recurrent stroke. Conclusions In RE-SPECT ESUS trial, expected risk factors previously linked to other common stroke causes were associated with stroke recurrence. These data help define high-risk groups for subsequent stroke that may be useful for clinicians and for researchers designing trials among patients with ESUS. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02239120.

Citing Articles

Proteomic Analyses of Clots Identify Stroke Etiologies in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Therapy.

Kim T, Jung J, Kim Y, Yoon B, Han D, Ko S CNS Neurosci Ther. 2025; 31(3):e70340.

PMID: 40079446 PMC: 11904956. DOI: 10.1111/cns.70340.


Arterial Hypertension and Its Consequences Are the Main Predictors of Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source.

Berdalin A, Namestnikova D, Cherkashova E, Golovin D, Gubskiy I, Lelyuk V Dis Markers. 2023; 2023:3469755.

PMID: 38025665 PMC: 10667056. DOI: 10.1155/2023/3469755.

References
1.
Diener H, Sacco R, Easton J, Granger C, Bernstein R, Uchiyama S . Dabigatran for Prevention of Stroke after Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source. N Engl J Med. 2019; 380(20):1906-1917. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1813959. View

2.
Koutroulou I, Tsivgoulis G, Tsalikakis D, Karacostas D, Grigoriadis N, Karapanayiotides T . Epidemiology of Patent Foramen Ovale in General Population and in Stroke Patients: A Narrative Review. Front Neurol. 2020; 11:281. PMC: 7198765. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00281. View

3.
Strambo D, Sirimarco G, Nannoni S, Perlepe K, Ntaios G, Vemmos K . Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source and Patent Foramen Ovale: Risk of Paradoxical Embolism Score Validation and Atrial Fibrillation Prediction. Stroke. 2021; 52(5):1643-1652. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032453. View

4.
Ueno Y, Tateishi Y, Doijiri R, Kuriki A, Shimizu T, Kikuno M . Large aortic arch plaques correlate with CHADS and CHADS-VASc scores in cryptogenic stroke. Atherosclerosis. 2019; 284:181-186. DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2019.03.009. View

5.
Hart R, Veltkamp R, Sheridan P, Sharma M, Kasner S, Bangdiwala S . Predictors of Recurrent Ischemic Stroke in Patients with Embolic Strokes of Undetermined Source and Effects of Rivaroxaban Versus Aspirin According to Risk Status: The NAVIGATE ESUS Trial. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019; 28(8):2273-2279. DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.05.014. View